West Ham Online

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.

XKhammer wrote: ↑23 Sep 2025, 09:47

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑23 Sep 2025, 07:14

XKhammer wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 23:08

Hasn't stopped you trying with the ladyboys in Thailand 

 

Trying what?

To understand them?

To respect them? (No innuendo there, unlike your "reminders" to me about UK pension rules made in the hope that someone "in authority" is reading your attempted grass and will take up "the case".)

To simply be civil to them?

To show that I'm not a shit-scared homophobe with regards to them?

They are, whether or not you like it, 100% human, from families with mothers and fathers....just like you & me, really.

Once again your admittance of guilt through deflection shouts out loud & clear.

Grow up and own your past.

If ever you needed proof Trannies are mentally ill you then get a post like this from one to confirm it

A whopping 12 months for the illegal who bravely managed to control his predatory instincts for a whole 8 days after arriving here, before he could hold them no longer, 12 fucking months...

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑23 Sep 2025, 07:14

XKhammer wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 23:08

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 22:13

Where are the (historical) examples of a woman impregnating another woman and/or a man impregnating another man without any artificial or medical assistance/intervention?

There must be some - plenty even - given the absolute insistence that these people believe they are correct.

Hasn't stopped you trying with the ladyboys in Thailand 

 

Trying what?

To understand them?

To respect them? (No innuendo there, unlike your "reminders" to me about UK pension rules made in the hope that someone "in authority" is reading your attempted grass and will take up "the case".)

To simply be civil to them?

To show that I'm not a shit-scared homophobe with regards to them?

They are, whether or not you like it, 100% human, from families with mothers and fathers....just like you & me, really.

Once again your admittance of guilt through deflection shouts out loud & clear.

Grow up and own your past.

Indo love the smiles on all the little faces of the antifa crowd.

What they all wear tactical gear and masks?  Oh that just screams friendly and civil then

Sydney_Iron wrote: ↑23 Sep 2025, 07:06 I see the orange man is going to designate Antifa a terrorist organisation

He does realize it's just a term for far-left fuckers who get violent or cause trouble at predominant left wing protests, the term derives from anti-fascist, yes they are cunts but its not like they are like Hamas or ISIS, they don't have leaders, don't have any structure it's just a term that's evolved to describe such vermin!

 

XKhammer wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 23:08

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 22:13

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 21:54 It's just the mental gymnastics and word salads they come out with trying to justify the indefensible. 

"Can a bird have a cock, yes or no?"

"Well first of all I'd like to take this opportunity to pay tribute to the LGBMNOPQRSTUVWXY.." 

*Far-Right nutter takes them out live on air*





 

Where are the (historical) examples of a woman impregnating another woman and/or a man impregnating another man without any artificial or medical assistance/intervention?

There must be some - plenty even - given the absolute insistence that these people believe they are correct.

Hasn't stopped you trying with the ladyboys in Thailand 

 

I see the orange man is going to designate Antifa a terrorist organisation

He does realize it's just a term for far-left fuckers who get violent or cause trouble at predominant left wing protests, the term derives from anti-fascist, yes they are cunts but its not like they are like Hamas or ISIS, they don't have leaders, don't have any structure it's just a term that's evolved to describe such vermin!

Now i dont have a problem with the Police getting tougher on these cunts, but by labeling them as terrorists, sets a very dangerous tone, it could be used against anyone you don't like or who disagrees with you, you just claim they are "Antifa" and arrests even shoot to kill (seeing as they are terrorists) can be implemented.

Along with his threats to free speech and shutting down media that doesn't toe the line, he is now getting into Putin territory when it comes to running the country if this stuff comes to pass.

Support what he did with illegals, The gender and DEI nonsense but he's getting a bit to authoritarian for my liking. if this stuff is actually implemented, hope he backs down a bit.

Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 22:13

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 21:54 It's just the mental gymnastics and word salads they come out with trying to justify the indefensible. 

"Can a bird have a cock, yes or no?"

"Well first of all I'd like to take this opportunity to pay tribute to the LGBMNOPQRSTUVWXY.." 

*Far-Right nutter takes them out live on air*



 

Where are the (historical) examples of a woman impregnating another woman and/or a man impregnating another man without any artificial or medical assistance/intervention?

There must be some - plenty even - given the absolute insistence that these people believe they are correct.

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 21:54 It's just the mental gymnastics and word salads they come out with trying to justify the indefensible. 

"Can a bird have a cock, yes or no?"

"Well first of all I'd like to take this opportunity to pay tribute to the LGBMNOPQRSTUVWXY.." 

*Far-Right nutter takes them out live on air*


 

It's just the mental gymnastics and word salads they come out with trying to justify the indefensible. 

"Can a bird have a cock, yes or no?"

"Well first of all I'd like to take this opportunity to pay tribute to the LGBMNOPQRSTUVWXY.." 

*Far-Right nutter takes them out live on air*

 

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 21:17 These Politicians are super thick and dangerous..

These Politicians are super thick and dangerous..

, wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 14:47 Is this “Police overreach” story anecdotal or has someone some context to add to it?

Nutsin wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 18:25

, wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 14:47 Is this “Police overreach” story anecdotal or has someone some context to add to it?

 

Poor old Coma needs someone to spell it out for him/her.

, wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 14:47 Is this “Police overreach” story anecdotal or has someone some context to add to it?

 

Part of the reason my boy jacked in the Met, grew sick of all the bollocks he had to put up with

, wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 14:47 Is this “Police overreach” story anecdotal or has someone some context to add to it?

Is this “Police overreach” story anecdotal or has someone some context to add to it?

Pub Bigot" wrote: ↑22 Sep 2025, 08:19 More Police overreach - Forcing their way into someone’s home because a kid viewed a post online that the thought police disagreed with. Forced entry with no warrant, and in truth no crime, and attempting to apprehend a device too. I would nail them for trespassing, coercion and attempted theft. 

It’s just to calm down some of his backbenchers who invested in this issue & think he is a dithering twat
Trying to stop the push for Andy Burnham to come back into parliament & replace him
Noone REALLY cares about Palestine & their terrorist overlords Hamas
Though the genocidal Israelis doing their best to lift support for them

Starmer really cares about the Palestine or just an attempt to stop the London marches and reduce/remove the cost of policing them?

Big financial government black hole, remember.

More Police overreach - Forcing their way into someone’s home because a kid viewed a post online that the thought police disagreed with. Forced entry with no warrant, and in truth no crime, and attempting to apprehend a device too. I would nail them for trespassing, coercion and attempted theft. 

I stand with Mr Plant Pot Head

Massive Attack" wrote: ↑21 Sep 2025, 01:36 Here's a good old boy that gives a clear example of what the Left get up too and exposes it..