West Ham Online

Not seen anything about whether he's been sacked or not?

You're looking at this all wrong. We NEED a Macaulay at the club to identify players who fit a predetermined system, contribute to the team and represent a future big profit.

We don't have the right people at the most senior levels to support this.

If we had such a system yielding returns year on year, we would then NEED a Steidten type at the club who could use the extra money to attract marquee signings he has identified from overseas.

But again, we don't have the right people at the club to finance this.

West Ham have had both of these experts in the last couple of seasons but has neither financed nor supported them for any length of time to do their jobs properly, then blamed those experts for gullible idiots on this site and elsewhere so it looks like they wasted money and time.

Even if that were true, it would be terrible management to chase these appointments, pay them good money then pay them to leave. But it isn't true, they began a project each that the club wouldn't sustain so they were made scapegoats.

Brady has to go.

Her position is now untenable .

Said earlier they’d wait & then quietly bin him 
During the international break naturally & no mention of the cost of wages & compensation paid about 5 mins ago
Embarrassing 

Brady … tvs business genius
You’re fired ….. HOPEFULLY 

Good riddance along with his other Chelsea failure that was so predictable to me would go tits up. 

The financial waste forked out by the Club on all this is ridiculous and was totally avoidable.

Hopefully though it'll mean it's 1 step closer for Brady to get the boot having been her star picks as management...

Just been officially binned on the OS

A very short statement reflecting the club’s embarassment? Well you’d hope they would be embarassed especially after Brady’s 100 word recent statement that talked about how the club’s future was being secured by the recruitment strategy of Potter and Macaulay

They ( Brady mostly but Sullivan too ) literally dress every reactive knee jerk decision up as if it is part of a well thought out plan.  They dont and never had a plan other than increasing their wealth thru the asset West Ham.  

We really do need people running the club who understand and have experience of building a strong football club. “No more BS” 

Oh dear. Comebacks aren't your strong suit, are they? I'll let you have the last word though so fill your boots.

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025, 14:23

Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025, 13:46

I suppose I could always change my username if I ever l make myself look like a dick and got things wrong?

Best change it today then. It's long overdue.

Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑08 Oct 2025, 13:46

I suppose I could always change my username if I ever l make myself look like a dick and got things wrong?

Jean-Luc Paul Goddard" wrote: ↑07 Oct 2025, 17:39

Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑07 Oct 2025, 17:24 "Eerie is always fairly positive about new signings"

then in same paragraph quoting him saying

"he'll be better than that clown Aguerd"

What's that got to do with anything? Aguerd wasn't a new signing at that point was he? I did say he usually ends up hating most of them.

Lee Trundle" wrote: ↑07 Oct 2025, 17:24 If you're looking at who's winning through point scoring with predictions, then surely I'm up there somewhere high on the leader board.  Probably CHAMP.

You're definitely up there with Jaan in the ALWAYS being negative about every signing just so I can say "I told you so" camp. Not sure why you'd want to boast about it though.

Apparently he ripped it up in Spain as well in the first 10 games, no one wanted to sign him in the end out there though.

Geezer is a melt.

He's a mixed bag for me of sometimes good and sometimes bad but he was also a part of the Team that helped us win a European Trophy, as did Emerson.

I do agree that he was an absolute cսnt for how he behaved in trying to get out the Club which was muggy, regardless of how much of a car crash the Club currently is. 

I'm just not surprised that either are doing well when they leave us (just as Aguerd did playing in Spain on loan) which says a lot about how poorly run we are to me than anything. 

In fairness, I thought Aguerd was going to be a good signing for us when he first rocked up. It was after a good few games he played that i realised he was utter pony.

I do turn quicker than milk out the fridge once I've seen enough.

Lee Trundle wrote: ↑07 Oct 2025, 17:24 "Eerie is always fairly positive about new signings"

then in same paragraph quoting him saying

"he'll be better than that clown Aguerd"

What's that got to do with anything? Aguerd wasn't a new signing at that point was he? I did say he usually ends up hating most of them.
​​​​​​​

Lee Trundle wrote: ↑07 Oct 2025, 17:24 If you're looking at who's winning through point scoring with predictions, then surely I'm up there somewhere high on the leader board.  Probably CHAMP.

You're definitely up there with Jaan in the ALWAYS being negative about every signing just so I can say "I told you so" camp. Not sure why you'd want to boast about it though.

"Eerie is always fairly positive about new signings"

then in same paragraph quoting him saying

"he'll be better than that clown Aguerd"


If you're looking at who's winning through point scoring with predictions, then surely I'm up there somewhere high on the leader board.  Probably CHAMP.

They've played 4 games in the French league, calm down.

Aguerd refused to play for us to force a move. The end.

Talking of Aguerd and Emerson for that matter, they both continue to rip the cսnt out of it playing at Marseille since they left to join them in both the League and Champions League. Marseille had lost 2 of their first 3 games and now cannot stop winning and conceding very few, even beating the Champions League holders in the process. 

Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025, 01:45

Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑29 Sep 2025, 13:58 Nearly as bad as your mate Loppy insisting on signing Kilman for £40mil, MA son.

Ag, like you  weren’t  all for Lopetegui and the Kilman signing. 

SHOOOOOOOCKEEEEERRRRR.!

In other breaking news. Scientists discover. Water is wet.!

Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: ↑30 Sep 2025, 01:45

Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑29 Sep 2025, 13:58 Nearly as bad as your mate Loppy insisting on signing Kilman for £40mil, MA son.

Ag, like you  weren’t  all for Lopetegui and the Kilman signing. 

Ahahahahaha,
The inevitable has happened where 'a club source' has said potter and Macauley had nothing to do with Diouf or Fernandes (i.e. the signings that have had the most upside so far) despite what was written at the time.

Fancy that. Who could have seen that coming?

Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑29 Sep 2025, 13:58 Nearly as bad as your mate Loppy insisting on signing Kilman for £40mil, MA son.

what about the aromatherapy coach..?
 

Guilty as charged. 

Nearly as bad as your mate Loppy insisting on signing Kilman for £40mil, MA son.

Fuck the wasteful cսnt off along with Potter. £40M for Fernandes, £20M for Hermansen, this the same chap that scouted and wanted Mudryk for £89M at Chelsea.

He aint the answer to our recruitment strategy especially when he also seeked new Full Backs we didn't need at the expense of getting in a young quality Striker with that money. That as well as clog up pathways for our own Academy players to progress. 

Can't wait to see the back of him along with his useless pal Potter.