Page 119 of 474
NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 10 Mar 2016, 09:51
by crystal falace
"Free agency started last night and was pretty crazy some huge money being spent. Osweiler getting £18m a year for the Texans, leaving the Broncos without a QB, Giants have spent a fortune on good but not great players, Oliver Vernon has more guaranteed money than JJ Watt. lots more deals but cant be bothered to list them all."
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 22 Nov 2021, 01:17
by El Scorchio
It's laughable how obvious it is that Buck and Aikman always openly want the Cowboys to win. Gets right on my tits.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 22 Nov 2021, 01:14
by southbankbornnbred
And I should add...our fucking owners need to sell up and get out of Gotham. They have overseen twenty two years of utter dross punctuated only intermittently by a rare gold-standard player like Revis.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 22 Nov 2021, 01:03
by southbankbornnbred
Vikes-Cheeseheads game looked a good one. Jefferson's stats are exceptional.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 22 Nov 2021, 01:01
by southbankbornnbred
"Yet another poor performance from Saleh's Jets. Some fans will wang on about a mild improvement compared with previous weeks.But the reality is that we lost fairly comfortably to a bang average, even poor, Fish side. This ain't getting much better under this coaching staff any time soon. Another complete write-off of a season. Seen a couple of articles this week, asking whether Saleh will be a one (season) and out coach. Can't see that, myself. Think he'll get 2022 to show some improvement. But we are a LONG way off being competitive. Lots of hype around Saleh when he got the gig. He is well short of where many experts thought he was as a coach. Very underwhelming so far. Can only hope the kid QB comes back, catches fire, and give us something to be encouraged about for 2022."
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 23:40
by Takashi Miike
"great win for the skins, heinicke continues to improve"
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 23:13
by OccupyGreenStreet
Incredible from Jonathan Taylor - guy's becoming a Fantasy cheat code. That's a big win for the Colts too.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 22:59
by Nutsin
"Niners get the W. Early East coast games can be tricky. Niners dominated from start to finish. Vikes at home next week""¶ Need to win that if we want to get in the playoffs!"
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 22:29
by Hermit Road
Got Taylor in my Fantasy Team. He currently has more points that the entire team I'm up against this week.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 22:19
by Norflundon
5 TD's for Jonathon Taylor what a performance
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 22:15
by Norflundon
"Wow Josh Allen not really looking like a 600million $ QB""¶."
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 21:59
by Norflundon
Trundle Going to watch it but will def have to hit record as I didn't get home from wolves till about 1am and my boy had a 9.30 KO so I'm fucking knackered so not sure if I'll stay awake No Amari cooper need the defence to step up need parson to get after mahomes
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 21:58
by Norflundon
Trundle Going to watch it but will def have to hit record as I didn't get home from wolves till about 1am and my boy had a 9.30 KO so I'm fucking knackered so not sure if I'll stay awake No Amari cooper need the defence to step up need parson to get after mahomes
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 21:47
by Lee Trundle
"Norflundon 4:20 Sun Nov 21 ""Big test for my boys tonight think it'll be a good game looking forward to see Dak and Mahomes match up"" I'll be staying up for it. Like you with the Cowboys, my in-laws are connected with the Chiefs so I've had them forced on me as a 2nd team. Should be a good game hopefully now the Chief have found some form, but I reckon a Cowboys win."
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 21:43
by Hermit Road
"Blimey Irons, the Birds are having a field day here. Big Play Slay at your service. Great day for whoever's got the Eagles defence in the fantasy league"
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 18:59
by ironsofcanada
Too many injured Saints these days. Defence is fighting hard but probably not enough points against the Eagles today.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 18:49
by Far Cough
Pretty sure we'll lose to the Cheese Heads
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 18:09
by southbankbornnbred
"Belichick's patsies looking ominously like Belichick's patsies, too. It's an open season, again. But I can see some established coaches and names finding another path to the play-offs."
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 18:07
by southbankbornnbred
"The Girls/Chiefs match-up should be a good one, Norf. McCarthy has got them playing well on both sides of the ball. Your brother is in a good place. But Reid et al will be a stern test. They're finding form at the right time."
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 21 Nov 2021, 16:20
by Norflundon
Big test for my boys tonight think it'll be a good game looking forward to see Dak and Mahomes match up
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 19 Nov 2021, 22:57
by CrowleyHammer
3 Falcons QBs threw 4 interceptions in 10 minutes
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 19 Nov 2021, 21:57
by Holstebro Hammer
28 points from the Pats Defense. FFS
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 19 Nov 2021, 18:11
by crystal falace
Patriots absolutely dominant yet again. Last 2 games 70-7
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 18 Nov 2021, 17:56
by OccupyGreenStreet
Falace - i'd be interested in Ekeler for one of my WRs not named Mike Evans. Have a look at my roster.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 18 Nov 2021, 15:57
by crystal falace
I have 4 elite running backs on my roster now in fantasy and all my wide receivers are getting hurt. Would be open to a trade for a very good receiver if anyone needs atop level running back.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 17 Nov 2021, 12:49
by southbankbornnbred
"Haha! Good point - maybe that was all factored in! It could go either way, couldn't it? He is a superb receiver when he's focused and makes some unbelievable catches at clutch moments. A proper pressure receiver. But it is high risk."