West Ham Online

Sydney_Iron wrote: ↑10 Mar 2025, 19:40

In the meantime, i would expect both sides of Politics in your neck of the woods to go all out to show how far they will go to protect Canada and resist all things the orange man throws your way, fully expect to see him on the news trolling and calling Carney the new Governor

ironsofcanada wrote: ↑10 Mar 2025, 14:08

Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑10 Mar 2025, 07:30 Canada replaces one davos sock puppet for yet another

But wait 113,00 members voted for him.


(One of aspects of the American system I prefer to ours (collective ours).)

Yeah but its not like this new bloke has won the popular vote, its Trudeau and his party choosing a new leader, so was always going to be someone of this ilk, don't you have elections that need to be had before the end of the year? See what the average Canadian thinks of him then i suppose!

In the meantime, i would expect both sides of Politics in your neck of the woods to go all out to show how far they will go to protect Canada and resist all things the orange man throws your way, fully expect to see him on the news trolling and calling Carney the new Governor

Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑10 Mar 2025, 16:31

riosleftsock wrote: ↑10 Mar 2025, 13:34 I missed the replies as I don't look on here as much any more.

Male circumcision was originally carried out as an essential hygiene practice in hot countries that had poor or no sanitation systems where fresh water was anything but.  It has its medical uses in a small number of cases today but a case could be made for banning it outside of medical necessity.  It has zero effect on the male's ability to enjoy sex in later life.

Female circumcision is an extremely misogynistic, barbaric practice that has high injury rates compared to male circumcision and is intended to deprive the female of any future sexual pleasure and ensure that for her, sex is purely an act of procreation.  I have not seen a single medical case made for female circumcision, neither have I heard of it being mentioned in the Torah, Talmud, Bible or Koran. It should be banned outright and lengthy prison sentences for those who practise it or allow it to be carried out, followed by permanent deportation for those involved and all family members.

Thank you, Captain Obvious. 

I do not subscribe to the view that because female circumcision is worse than male circumcision, this makes male circumcision ok. It's like saying rape is ok because murder is worse.

We no longer live in deserts with no access to water to wash in. Male circumcision is no longer required. To continue to practise the butchery is disgusting. 

riosleftsock wrote: ↑10 Mar 2025, 13:34 I missed the replies as I don't look on here as much any more.

Male circumcision was originally carried out as an essential hygiene practice in hot countries that had poor or no sanitation systems where fresh water was anything but.  It has its medical uses in a small number of cases today but a case could be made for banning it outside of medical necessity.  It has zero effect on the male's ability to enjoy sex in later life.

Female circumcision is an extremely misogynistic, barbaric practice that has high injury rates compared to male circumcision and is intended to deprive the female of any future sexual pleasure and ensure that for her, sex is purely an act of procreation.  I have not seen a single medical case made for female circumcision, neither have I heard of it being mentioned in the Torah, Talmud, Bible or Koran. It should be banned outright and lengthy prison sentences for those who practise it or allow it to be carried out, followed by permanent deportation for those involved and all family members.

Thank you, Captain Obvious. 

I do not subscribe to the view that because female circumcision is worse than male circumcision, this makes male circumcision ok. It's like saying rape is ok because murder is worse.

We no longer live in deserts with no access to water to wash in. Male circumcision is no longer required. To continue to practise the butchery is disgusting. 

Takashi Miike wrote: ↑10 Mar 2025, 07:30 Canada replaces one davos sock puppet for yet another

riosleftsock wrote: ↑09 Mar 2025, 21:18 Male and female circumcision are entirely different procedures carried out for entirely different reasons and with very different effects on the individuals.  

Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑10 Mar 2025, 07:30 Canada replaces one davos sock puppet for yet another

Nutsin wrote: ↑07 Mar 2025, 21:10

mallard wrote: ↑07 Mar 2025, 20:43

Nutsin wrote: ↑07 Mar 2025, 19:42 Here you go, watch this!



This is progress!

 

Doesn’t look like that link has made much progress 

Yeah mods took it down, it was just a video of a cow getting its throat slit open and left to bleed out in the name of Halal. Pretty fucking shocking!

Amazing what the UK tolerates these days. And what it doesn’t. 

The progressives have taken us all back to the dark ages.

riosleftsock wrote: ↑09 Mar 2025, 21:18 Male and female circumcision are entirely different procedures carried out for entirely different reasons and with very different effects on the individuals.  

Nurse Ratched" wrote: ↑09 Mar 2025, 11:03

Pub Bigot" wrote: ↑09 Mar 2025, 07:40 Kosher and Halal meat should be banned. Don’t like it? Move to places where it’s acceptable. 

I am generally pro-Jew, but I agree with this.

I also think the ritual/religious/cultural circumcision of male infants should be banned in this country, just as it is for females.

Pub Bigot" wrote: ↑09 Mar 2025, 07:40 Kosher and Halal meat should be banned. Don’t like it? Move to places where it’s acceptable. 

Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: ↑07 Mar 2025, 19:23 "We plan to introduce a mechanism so that by the end of the year every adult male will be trained in case of war," — Polish PM Tusk

LET ME SEE YOUR WAR FACE, PRIVATE PICKLE!