Stephen Fry on Kuntsberg

[COOL HAND LUKE]

"This fat, stupid, useless bastard has popped up on Kuntsberg's utterly Biased Bullshit Corporation show, pissing and moaning about Brexit. Apparently, we've ALL 'changed our minds' and think it's a catastrophe... he presented this as a FACT, and of course the Kunt' did little to deter or correct him... Barclays like Fry give air to their brainwashed views and never seem to get challenged - perhaps she knew he would be struck dumb if she'd said, ""Okay, and what exactly do you base that comment on Stephen?"" And of course, that's his live appearances shot to shit - he's just alienated around 60% of any fanbase likely to attend them. Mug."

[Capitol Man]

"stewie griffin 6:59 Fri Sep 15 Re: Stephen Fry on Kuntsberg Sorry Stevie - did you ever get round to explaining what your thoughts on Biden had to do with this post about Brexit and the EU? And then you also didn't actually come up with any examples or how Biden was ""incompetent"" and ""corrupt"". Just some rambling stuff about issues in US cities and poor infrastructure, that was a bit stupid to associate with a man in power for 2.5 years. Then there was the corruption part where you had zero evidence of any, but you thought there must be something because you've read stuff about his son. So it was a shit attempt to troll wasn't it. And thickii - there's a long history of looney posts with him, and I admittedly think it's somewhat pathetic to try and blame the fact that Brexit hasn't been the miracles and rainbows that were promised on the people who said it was a bad idea in the first place. BLM - I didn't ""support"" it in an active way, but the concept that if law enforcement kill someone, then that should be properly investigated. Again, it's a shit attempt by you to try and tie me to your own biased perceptions of what it was and wasn't. So here's a little summary and some questions for you to clear up my misunderstandings. 1) what has Biden got to do with Brexit? 2) Did you find any examples of ""incompetence"" beyond homelessness and the state of us cities and infrastructure. 3) Did you have any examples of ""Joe"" Biden's corruption that are more than your feelings that he must have been involved in his son's businesses. 4) How exactly do you think I'm actually supporting the organization of BLM as opposed to the concept that people should be treated equally before the law? You understand the difference between supporting the organization and thinking that the broader cause may have some genuine issues behind it. In terms of extremism - there's a lot of historical context there that can help you understand these movements. There's a lot of parallels between today's populist movements and the rise of fascism in Europe, just as there are between Putin's Russia and Hitler's Germany. I'd also recommend you learn a little more about history, learn how to back up a point with some substance, rather than your feelings, and to stop constructing such flimsy straw-man arguments."

[stewie griffin]

"And by the way, your continued failure to grasp the fact that you were being called out for your lack of self awareness, and that I couldn't give a shit about brexit, even 72 hours later, suggests a major mental handicap of some description. You should look into that , it could become debilitating."

[stewie griffin]

"Capitol Man An inaccurate representation of our interaction. As a reminder, you wrote ""What you see here from the likes of thicki here is the kind of spineless slugs who always looks for someone else to blame when stuff he supports go wrong"" you later wrote, ""Not sure what my ""support"" of BLM has to do with it, but I support it only in I think that people should be treated equally by both law enforcement and the law itself. Not sure that's especially radical given that's the concept behind law in pretty much all countries, it's the application that falls down. I was against the nonsense about Antifa and the many many people on here who mischaracterized the entire debate, mostly because they don't like black people"" So, you supported an organisation and movement that ripped off millions, proved to be a giant Ponzi scheme, did precisely zero to help any Black people at all - other than the leaders who purchased themselves a variety of mansions - and didn't give a single cent of the millions they earned to George Floyd's family; but you blame the stuff you supported going wrong on WHO posters who, apparently, without any basis, 'don't like black people'. So, by your own definition, you are a spineless slug. I'd also be cautious around branding others as extremists; in the grand scheme of the history of the world beyond the last 5 years when the meaning of words has been redefined by a group who have zero authority to redefine words, your views are far more extreme than the views of most on here."

[BRANDED]

In most real world debates there are generally rules around how the debate will progress. There is good reason for that.

[Willtell]

"2At what stage is it ok to point out the utter lunacy of what someone is posting. Are we supposed to pretend that every bit of extremism and crap is to be treated seriously?2 -------------------------------------- Oh OK then Capitol Man. Several posters have been trying hard to tell you that you post up every bit of left wing extremism and crap. As such you are considered, a bit of a lunatic from the unacceptable side of left wing politics.."

[Mike Oxsaw]

"BRANDED 6:47 Fri Sep 15 Walking away is losing; it's what cry-baby little school girls do. REAL men stand their ground and fight...and fixate about other posters' genitals, apparently."

[BRANDED]

"Sorry. Are you saying you do or dont meet people with different views from you in the real World? As far as language is concerned, I’m happy with it. I’m not a banning type person. I admit it may not correspond to ypur or my norms but thats fine by me. I can always just walk away. As far as Covid is concerned the narrative has moved enormously since the start. But, obviously it would depend on which narrative you observe. As far as Ukraine is concerned. History will be on the side of the victor but I cant see a victor here. I genuinely suggest if it troubles you so much you walk away or just avoid politics."

[Capitol Man]

"BRANDED 5:24 Fri Sep 15 Re: Stephen Fry on Kuntsberg Pretty much the opposite of what I said. Opposing views are common. Two years posting literally everything you find online that is anti-vaccine, for example, is something else. Having questions about the Ukraine war is one thing, posting every bit of Russian propaganda another. Openly racist posts on a continual basis or posters that only seem to pipe up on those threads that talk about race. We supposed to pretend that they aren't racist - that Golden Oldie's views are ok? There's a lot on here with very similar views who think they are cleaver by no expressing them in his overt way. Trolling attempts - take little Stevie on thread. Didn't like what I posted on Europe, thought he'd randomly troll me on Biden. Small Cock's weak trolling attempts on virtually everything. Look at the substance of what is being said and the history of who is posting it. At what stage is it ok to point out the utter lunacy of what someone is posting. Are we supposed to pretend that every bit of extremism and crap is to be treated seriously?"

[Mike Oxsaw]

Capitol Man 5:16 Fri Sep 15 You are aware that you have complete control over whether or not you interact with such people? That's total management power right there.

[BRANDED]

"You never speak with people with a different view if the World to you in the real World? That, my friend, is your problem right there. Practice in the real World might help you."

[Capitol Man]

"MPI - Do I talk to people in real life like I talk to them on here - no. Do the people I regularly interact with on a daily basis barrage me with a bunch of extremist ideas, conspiracy theories, disinformation and shit trolling attempts - also no. Would I say something if someone in my company started talking some of the crap you see on here - very possibly, would depend on the situation."

[Moncurs Putting Iron]

BRANDED 4:31 Fri Sep 15 *Breaks off from struggling to get into oversized sequin cocktail dress and belt out' I am what I am' on the Karoake machine* What you saying Branded?

[goose]

hilarious how a poster who refers to the Chinese as 'tiddly winks' and threatened to kill another poster is bitching about moderation.

[goose]

hilarious how a poster who refers to the Chinese as 'tiddly winks' and threatened to kill another poster is bitching about moderation.

[Side of Ham]

A sad bloke in his 60's living out his well overrun midlife fantasist crisis is not someone to be jealous of Swiiiiiiiiiiiiiiisssssssss.........as for you and Pickle........made for each other.....hahahaha!

[Mike Oxsaw]

"Swiss. 4:45 Fri Sep 15 Given that, Knoblerone, in the real world, I never acknowledge even being aware of this site, how do you know that you've never met me?"

[Takashi Miike]

"jealous ?üòÇ?üëç as I said, a horrible narcissist cսnt"

[Swiss.]

"Moncurs Putting Iron 2:36 Fri Sep 15 Thanks for that. Strangley I was going post something similar. I've met yourself I think on 3 occasions and many of the posters on WHO all of which I've had pleasant encounters with and very sure these were reciprocated, Yet people like Snide, Talkshitty Mike, Oxbore et al I haven't and doubt have met any on WHO. However they seem to know me inside out. I've never lied about my adventures and posting them on here is fun to wind these people up. Deep down they are jealous and sad individuals who obviously take this forum far too seriously. I don't think they add any value. Constantly making biggoted remarks about H&P for example. They are what's wrong with this site. I"

[BRANDED]

MPI Dont be a massive drama queen. Having people call you names on WHO is a badge of honour. If you want polite discourse this site is unlikely to ever satisfy you. People who want to be polite fail to appreciate that other people can be massive cunts most of the time and they have no other modus operandi. That all said. You do get a view of the sewer.

[Mike Oxsaw]

"Not sure that there is any misinterpretation, hot, bothered or otherwise. The message is quite cleat: ""All views posted that do not align with mine must be 'moderated', my views get a free pass because, well, I'm me."""

[Hammer and Pickle]

Just reiterating my previous post as it seems to be attracting a lot of hot-and-bothered misinterpretation.

[Hammer and Pickle]

"MPI Hardly surprising if those attempting to demonstrate facts, however sensitive or uncomfortable to handle, are howled down and personally attacked on a routine basis. Or the site is used as a platform to spread blatant propaganda and disinformation. All without a trace of adequate moderation. I think this is perfectly clear and free from ambiguity for anyone with normal adult verbal reasoning skills. I'll be happy to discuss it sensibly anytime you want."

[Jaan Kenbrovin]

"‘Hardly surprising if those attempting to demonstrate facts, however sensitive or uncomfortable to handle, are howled down and personally attacked on a routine basis’ Having spent over a year ignoring you and your constant insults towards me, that is some top tier hypocrisy."

[Moncurs Putting Iron]

"Thanks for the responses guys, I just read a page and was like ""Blimey that's a bit strong!"" I dont propose to do anything about it or think I really need to, we all know this is a loosely moderated site and it's up to us. Takashi Miike 2:45 Fri Sep 15 Your last statement here is a good point, I do try to find common ground with people and if there is someone on the site I violently disagree with I might have a little dig then try to avoid them. I am not a good yardstick as a typical WHOer. Too soft. :-)"

[Side of Ham]

See here's the thing MPI the best con artists are the most charming cunts you'll ever meet in person.......and all you get to read about Swiss and the like is this...... Takashi Miike 2:45 Fri Sep 15 Takashi Miike 3:18 Fri Sep 15