"Free agency started last night and was pretty crazy some huge money being spent. Osweiler getting £18m a year for the Texans, leaving the Broncos without a QB, Giants have spent a fortune on good but not great players, Oliver Vernon has more guaranteed money than JJ Watt. lots more deals but cant be bothered to list them all."
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 24 Sep 2024, 15:24
by southbankbornnbred
So much hate for the Jets on here. Yet, like the masters they are, they're 2-1 and putting the Patsies to the sword.
Just thought I'd write that while I get the chance. Thank you.
I will, of course, he back when we're 3-11 and struggling again...
Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑23 Sep 2024, 09:15
yes, you can probably go full screen on a laptop. I use a tablet to watch it, but you may even be able to access it on a smart tv (I don't have one so no idea if it's possible). you get the yank commentary too, so it's worth a look
Awesome- cheers! Will give it a go. That is potentially a massive money saver.
remember to leave the 1p in the account, if you're not already with them
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 23 Sep 2024, 12:45
by El Scorchio
Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑23 Sep 2024, 12:15
Sam Darnold looking like prime time Tom Brady
Sort of goes to show you doesn’t it that sometimes a ‘failure’ of a QB just needs to be put in the right situation to produce something. I mean it always helps to have a Jefferson to throw to and there’s no guarantee he can keep it up but good luck to him.
so many of the top drafted qbs these days are dropped into horrendous teams with little talent and made the starter right away with the message ‘ok- save us’. It’s no wonder so many of them seem to look like absolute busts. You at least want to have a serviceable offense around you. It’s not really a surprise that the qbs drafted by teams like the packers and Steelers turn out ok as the team around them is always fundamentally decent and well coached, and players who got drafted by the jets or bears or panthers etc (no offence boys) often flame out or look awful and get moved on. Usually to another equally shitty team where it happens again.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 23 Sep 2024, 12:39
by El Scorchio
Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑23 Sep 2024, 09:15
yes, you can probably go full screen on a laptop. I use a tablet to watch it, but you may even be able to access it on a smart tv (I don't have one so no idea if it's possible). you get the yank commentary too, so it's worth a look
Awesome- cheers! Will give it a go. That is potentially a massive money saver.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 23 Sep 2024, 12:15
by Far Cough UKunt
Sam Darnold looking like prime time Tom Brady
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 23 Sep 2024, 11:50
by Grumpster
Well well well, let's hope that bastard Mr Burns choked on his cornflakes this morning like the niners did last night.
Impossible replacing McCaffrey as were finding out, but can be no excuses as ther were without a couple of star receivers as well.
D is just looking shit, dar too many easy plays given away.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 23 Sep 2024, 09:15
by Takashi Miike
yes, you can probably go full screen on a laptop. I use a tablet to watch it, but you may even be able to access it on a smart tv (I don't have one so no idea if it's possible). you get the yank commentary too, so it's worth a look
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 23 Sep 2024, 09:02
by El Scorchio
Is that just on mobile or can you get it to play on laptop/tv as well? DAZN are so shit their app and website won’t even let me sign up or create an account to rob money from me for their piss poor product.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 23 Sep 2024, 06:43
by Far Cough UKunt
Skol Vikes!
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 23 Sep 2024, 00:14
by Joe C
3-0 start, did not see that happening at all. Totally trounced the smelly fish men
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 22 Sep 2024, 20:06
by Takashi Miike
It anyone wants game coverage, B365 show all the non sky games. You just need a funded account (1p) to access the streams
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 22 Sep 2024, 19:55
by RBshorty
New Orleans beat them Dirty Birds and that the Cherry on top of my Sundae.!
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 22 Sep 2024, 19:50
by Takashi Miike
It will make my weekend if the Saints can get the win, and then the Ravens batter those cunts at 9.25
I was impressed with Nabers last week, very elusive and tough too. Took a nasty hit from Luvu and went straight back in once cleared
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 22 Sep 2024, 19:41
by RBshorty
Gonna to keep my powder dry at the mo. But the Giants may just save my weekend.?
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 20 Sep 2024, 11:15
by Trilby55
Rodgers was 27 of 35 for 281 yds last night , not bad for the oldest fella in the league .
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 17 Sep 2024, 22:38
by zebthecat
I've changed the league to six teams.
If anyone fancies it that would be great - You'd enjoy it Miike.
My fall back was dropping my team so the four of you can duke it out but it won't allow me to do that.
Looks like week four is the earliest kick off as week three starts on Thursday.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 20:45
by zebthecat
Last call for any more for Fantasy NFL.
We need 3 more teams to make it an eght team league and one more for a six.
Will decide what to do first thing tomorrow.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 15:41
by Joe C
Grumpster wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 20:55
You know you've played like cunts when you make sam darnold look like a player.
He is dog shit.
Week 5 and McCaffrey's return can't come soon enough.
At least you still turn up on here when you’ve been beaten Grumps, Nutsin won’t be back until you win a game again.
Encouraging start for the Seahawks so far, looking better than I thought we would in what will be a transitional season. Missing three of our starting O line would normally be a certain defeat, but just about pulled it off against an improving Patriots yesterday. Smith-Njigba is going to be some player.
Beat the smelly fish men next weekend on the road and I’ll consider our start excellent
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 10:30
by Takashi Miike
cough, we had two brilliant DEs during our glory years, Mann & Manley. neither have been honoured by the hall of fame. they couldn't wait to throw a jacket on ray lewis, yet those two are still being ignored thirty years on
I watched an interview not long ago with the redskins hating parasite peter king (a big cheese on the selection committee), he was talking to one of our best beat reporters (john keim) and was asked why joe jacoby was still waiting to be honoured. his answer "Joe, sometimes had a lot of trouble with Lawrence Taylor". who fucking didn't?
Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 21:57
yes, should have been a comfortable win if the O-line hadn't kept making stupid mistakes. I'll take any win after last week, daniels is something special
The number of false starts was mind-boggling. And way beyond my comprehension of the game - I was wondering if it was something to do with Daniels waiting too long or something.
We're obviously better off with him than Howell, but seeing slightly more sensible play-calling makes me feel even more sorry for Howell.
The manner of the win - all FGs - is pretty funny after the struggles we've had with kickers.
No, nothing to do with Jayden. Schlereth (our ex super bowl lineman) was spot on in the commentary saying that the giants (and in particular dexter lawrence) were making slight lateral adjustments/shifts prior to the snap and it was unnerving our line. A bit more composure and we could have scored 30+. Monday will be a good test
Dexter Lawrence = Dexter Manley and Lawrence Taylor, that's one heck of a lineman / linebacker.
Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 21:57
yes, should have been a comfortable win if the O-line hadn't kept making stupid mistakes. I'll take any win after last week, daniels is something special
The number of false starts was mind-boggling. And way beyond my comprehension of the game - I was wondering if it was something to do with Daniels waiting too long or something.
We're obviously better off with him than Howell, but seeing slightly more sensible play-calling makes me feel even more sorry for Howell.
The manner of the win - all FGs - is pretty funny after the struggles we've had with kickers.
No, nothing to do with Jayden. Schlereth (our ex super bowl lineman) was spot on in the commentary saying that the giants (and in particular dexter lawrence) were making slight lateral adjustments/shifts prior to the snap and it was unnerving our line. A bit more composure and we could have scored 30+. Monday will be a good test
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 08:57
by stewie griffin
Pretty much the perfect Sunday evening - Cowboys & 9ers getting roundly stuffed. Highly amusing.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Posted: 16 Sep 2024, 08:28
by On The Ball
Takashi Miike" wrote: ↑15 Sep 2024, 21:57
yes, should have been a comfortable win if the O-line hadn't kept making stupid mistakes. I'll take any win after last week, daniels is something special
The number of false starts was mind-boggling. And way beyond my comprehension of the game - I was wondering if it was something to do with Daniels waiting too long or something.
We're obviously better off with him than Howell, but seeing slightly more sensible play-calling makes me feel even more sorry for Howell.
The manner of the win - all FGs - is pretty funny after the struggles we've had with kickers.
