West Ham Online

Posted: **12 Sep 2024, 11:11**

anyone concerned for their job yet? i've been using it in mine and I can see the writing on the wall before they decide to cut out the middle man. in 20 years I can see a lot of white collar jobs disappearing, with not enough jobs to go around what's the solution, universal wage?

Posted: **09 Jun 2025, 20:16**

interesting development.

Advanced AI suffers ‘complete accuracy collapse’ in face of complex problems, study finds

““The finding that large reason models lose the plot on complex problems, while performing well on medium- and low-complexity problems implies that we’re in a potential cul-de-sac in current approaches,” he said.”

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... y-collapse

Posted: **21 May 2025, 09:21**

I can't even read my own handwriting, maybe I should apply to be a doctor?

Posted: **21 May 2025, 09:05**

Monsieur merde de cheval - "anyone still use a PEN ? handwritten letters...that kind of thing"?

I do as much as possible still.

All my work notes, reminders, instructions etc are handwritten rather than typed and even though I know it sounds really old fashioned, I still take pride in my handwriting.

Am a real technophobe and at work when they introduced PCs I resisted having one until it was 100% mandatory. Would go back to how it was before pcs at work right now if it was an option - things were far, far more straight forward IMHO and people in general were far less wound up.

This site is pretty much the only form of 'social media' I've ever used.

A couple of historians have a theory that when powerful civilisations in the past have sensed their demise, they've pretty much almost subconsciously drastically increased the gathering together of all things that showed off their former glories and their worth.

I reckon there's a bit of that going on with AI - talking of hundreds of years away, but our descendants may look back those hundreds of years and see AI as part of a last gasp.

Posted: **20 May 2025, 18:22**

wils wrote: ↑20 May 2025, 13:24
Vexed wrote: ↑20 May 2025, 10:53
wils wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 19:10
It is nothing and you are mistaken. The CEO said that AI writes 30%-40% of the code and then in a separate announcement they laid off 6,000 workers aimed at 'reducing management'. Some media that don't understand how AI is used in coding have written articles putting the two separate announcements together insinuating cause and effect.

When the CEO says 30%-40% of the code is written by AI, that doesn't mean someone prompts AI for some code and it then deploys it to a production environment bypassing the need for software engineer; that can't happen. Software engineers use CoPilot to write small routines and test cases that absolutely have to be checked and integrated by engineers before it goes into a production environment. The jury isn't even out if this makes the process more efficient. Where I work we require two engineers (instead of one) to review any code that AI has been anywhere near. That code will then come under that 30%-40% statistic of "AI written" code.

AI can indirectly affect the market for engineers, but no company is deploying any AI written code at the expense of engineers. It may happen one day, but its a way off.

That's top drawer human generated cope. It's happening. It's out there in black and white. I mean Microsoft, what do they know about coding anyway? Fucking no marks!

I honestly don't know why you're denying the inevitable. Roll on 2027.

I don't know mate. You seem to be emotional about this and have some reason to will it on rather than having an informed opinion. I'll leave you to it.

Top flouncing!

Posted: **20 May 2025, 13:24**

Vexed wrote: ↑20 May 2025, 10:53
wils wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 19:10
Vexed wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 18:12 Microsoft laying off several thousand people, most of them developers. AI does 30-40% of the coding now.

Probably nothing. I must be mistaken....

It is nothing and you are mistaken. The CEO said that AI writes 30%-40% of the code and then in a separate announcement they laid off 6,000 workers aimed at 'reducing management'. Some media that don't understand how AI is used in coding have written articles putting the two separate announcements together insinuating cause and effect.

When the CEO says 30%-40% of the code is written by AI, that doesn't mean someone prompts AI for some code and it then deploys it to a production environment bypassing the need for software engineer; that can't happen. Software engineers use CoPilot to write small routines and test cases that absolutely have to be checked and integrated by engineers before it goes into a production environment. The jury isn't even out if this makes the process more efficient. Where I work we require two engineers (instead of one) to review any code that AI has been anywhere near. That code will then come under that 30%-40% statistic of "AI written" code.

AI can indirectly affect the market for engineers, but no company is deploying any AI written code at the expense of engineers. It may happen one day, but its a way off.

That's top drawer human generated cope. It's happening. It's out there in black and white. I mean Microsoft, what do they know about coding anyway? Fucking no marks!

I honestly don't know why you're denying the inevitable. Roll on 2027.

I don't know mate. You seem to be emotional about this and have some reason to will it on rather than having an informed opinion. I'll leave you to it.

Posted: **20 May 2025, 10:54**

Far Cough UKunt" wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 19:19 Which team will be first to be managed by an AI bot?

I'd probably take that over Potter.

Posted: **20 May 2025, 10:53**

wils wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 19:10
Vexed wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 18:12 Microsoft laying off several thousand people, most of them developers. AI does 30-40% of the coding now.

Probably nothing. I must be mistaken....

It is nothing and you are mistaken. The CEO said that AI writes 30%-40% of the code and then in a separate announcement they laid off 6,000 workers aimed at 'reducing management'. Some media that don't understand how AI is used in coding have written articles putting the two separate announcements together insinuating cause and effect.

When the CEO says 30%-40% of the code is written by AI, that doesn't mean someone prompts AI for some code and it then deploys it to a production environment bypassing the need for software engineer; that can't happen. Software engineers use CoPilot to write small routines and test cases that absolutely have to be checked and integrated by engineers before it goes into a production environment. The jury isn't even out if this makes the process more efficient. Where I work we require two engineers (instead of one) to review any code that AI has been anywhere near. That code will then come under that 30%-40% statistic of "AI written" code.

AI can indirectly affect the market for engineers, but no company is deploying any AI written code at the expense of engineers. It may happen one day, but its a way off.

That's top drawer human generated cope. It's happening. It's out there in black and white. I mean Microsoft, what do they know about coding anyway? Fucking no marks!

I honestly don't know why you're denying the inevitable. Roll on 2027.

Posted: **19 May 2025, 21:48**

Grok has been having a bit of a mare recently.
X's explanation of untested code going live is a bit of a worry to say the least. I haven't seen that sort of fuck up at work since the dot com boom.

Posted: **19 May 2025, 21:01**

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 20:15
wils wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 19:10
Vexed wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 18:12 Microsoft laying off several thousand people, most of them developers. AI does 30-40% of the coding now.

Probably nothing. I must be mistaken....

It is nothing and you are mistaken. The CEO said that AI writes 30%-40% of the code and then in a separate announcement they laid off 6,000 workers aimed at 'reducing management'. Some media that don't understand how AI is used in coding have written articles putting the two separate announcements together insinuating cause and effect.

When the CEO says 30%-40% of the code is written by AI, that doesn't mean someone prompts AI for some code and it then deploys it to a production environment bypassing the need for software engineer; that can't happen. Software engineers use CoPilot to write small routines and test cases that absolutely have to be checked and integrated by engineers before it goes into a production environment. The jury isn't even out if this makes the process more efficient. Where I work we require two engineers (instead of one) to review any code that AI has been anywhere near. That code will then come under that 30%-40% statistic of "AI written" code.

AI can indirectly affect the market for engineers, but no company is deploying any AI written code at the expense of engineers. It may happen one day, but its a way off.

I'm betting people that built cars said that when robotics first started being implemented.

I am sure they did in 1961 when the first prototypes were deployed in car factories. The mid 80s - a quarter of century later - when the most of the jobs were lost they must have been laughing on the other side of their face.

Posted: **19 May 2025, 20:15**

wils wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 19:10
Vexed wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 18:12 Microsoft laying off several thousand people, most of them developers. AI does 30-40% of the coding now.

Probably nothing. I must be mistaken....

It is nothing and you are mistaken. The CEO said that AI writes 30%-40% of the code and then in a separate announcement they laid off 6,000 workers aimed at 'reducing management'. Some media that don't understand how AI is used in coding have written articles putting the two separate announcements together insinuating cause and effect.

When the CEO says 30%-40% of the code is written by AI, that doesn't mean someone prompts AI for some code and it then deploys it to a production environment bypassing the need for software engineer; that can't happen. Software engineers use CoPilot to write small routines and test cases that absolutely have to be checked and integrated by engineers before it goes into a production environment. The jury isn't even out if this makes the process more efficient. Where I work we require two engineers (instead of one) to review any code that AI has been anywhere near. That code will then come under that 30%-40% statistic of "AI written" code.

AI can indirectly affect the market for engineers, but no company is deploying any AI written code at the expense of engineers. It may happen one day, but its a way off.

I'm betting people that built cars said that when robotics first started being implemented.

Posted: **19 May 2025, 19:19**

Which team will be first to be managed by an AI bot?

Posted: **19 May 2025, 19:16**

Vexed. Have a read...

Posted: **19 May 2025, 19:13**

Bloody AI, coming over here and stealing our jobs..

Posted: **19 May 2025, 19:10**

Vexed wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 18:12 Microsoft laying off several thousand people, most of them developers. AI does 30-40% of the coding now.

Probably nothing. I must be mistaken....

It is nothing and you are mistaken. The CEO said that AI writes 30%-40% of the code and then in a separate announcement they laid off 6,000 workers aimed at 'reducing management'. Some media that don't understand how AI is used in coding have written articles putting the two separate announcements together insinuating cause and effect.

When the CEO says 30%-40% of the code is written by AI, that doesn't mean someone prompts AI for some code and it then deploys it to a production environment bypassing the need for software engineer; that can't happen. Software engineers use CoPilot to write small routines and test cases that absolutely have to be checked and integrated by engineers before it goes into a production environment. The jury isn't even out if this makes the process more efficient. Where I work we require two engineers (instead of one) to review any code that AI has been anywhere near. That code will then come under that 30%-40% statistic of "AI written" code.

AI can indirectly affect the market for engineers, but no company is deploying any AI written code at the expense of engineers. It may happen one day, but its a way off.

Posted: **19 May 2025, 18:54**

I thought AI was just what confused northerners said once the penny finally dropped in a conversation.

Posted: **19 May 2025, 18:12**

Microsoft laying off several thousand people, most of them developers. AI does 30-40% of the coding now.

Probably nothing. I must be mistaken....

Posted: **03 May 2025, 02:23**

I'm surprised people aren't uploading pictures they had chatgpt compose for them. I've been having fun with that, especially with a Palace supporting mate.

Posted: **01 May 2025, 11:59**

honky cat" wrote: ↑29 Apr 2025, 20:22 The site will be plagued by AI bots now.

At least they will be more active and less boring than the average WHO poster.

Posted: **01 May 2025, 11:16**

Mr Anon" wrote: ↑12 Sep 2024, 11:11 anyone concerned for their job yet? i've been using it in mine and I can see the writing on the wall before they decide to cut out the middle man. in 20 years I can see a lot of white collar jobs disappearing, with not enough jobs to go around what's the solution, universal wage?

There is already Universal Income Trials going on in the UK. Not sure how many people but they are getting about 1600 a month for a certain amount of years. They want to see if these people opt to work or not. Trials could well be for this very reason.

Posted: **01 May 2025, 03:31**

It's all the far - rights fault.
those elusive devils.

Posted: **30 Apr 2025, 07:33**

goose wrote: ↑29 Apr 2025, 20:05 On West Ham Online (WHO), the poster known as goose is a prominent and often polarizing figure. With over 3,600 posts, goose is known for his direct, no-nonsense style, frequently engaging in spirited debates across various threads.

goose is recognized for his sharp wit and unfiltered commentary. He doesn’t shy away from expressing strong opinions, often challenging other users and sparking lively discussions. His posts can be confrontational, but they also contribute to the dynamic nature of the forum.

goose’s forthright approach has earned him both admirers and detractors. Some users appreciate his honesty and the energy he brings to discussions, while others find his style abrasive. Regardless, his contributions are a significant part of the forum’s character.

If that AI was any good and understood the nature of this place the answer would have been a simple:

(insert user name) is a cսnt.

Posted: **30 Apr 2025, 06:11**

honky cat" wrote: ↑29 Apr 2025, 20:22 The site will be plagued by AI bots now.

Knowing WHO, it will be AI Botties (Fnar! Fnar! Snck! Snck!! Yuk! Yuk!)

Posted: **29 Apr 2025, 20:22**

The site will be plagued by AI bots now.

Posted: **29 Apr 2025, 20:05**

On West Ham Online (WHO), the poster known as goose is a prominent and often polarizing figure. With over 3,600 posts, goose is known for his direct, no-nonsense style, frequently engaging in spirited debates across various threads.

goose is recognized for his sharp wit and unfiltered commentary. He doesn’t shy away from expressing strong opinions, often challenging other users and sparking lively discussions. His posts can be confrontational, but they also contribute to the dynamic nature of the forum.

goose’s forthright approach has earned him both admirers and detractors. Some users appreciate his honesty and the energy he brings to discussions, while others find his style abrasive. Regardless, his contributions are a significant part of the forum’s character.

Posted: **29 Apr 2025, 19:37**

East hammer.

Yes I sometime asked it things like
"Can you please show me 3 simultaneous equations for foundation edexcel maths gcse" or something like that whwre I can tailor the content, style of question and level.

West Ham Online

Chat GPT

Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT

Re: Chat GPT