A multi millionaire and bless poor little snowflake who can't afford his own counselling...CՍNT
Has he taken your own appointment with a counsellor then? Jumped the queue, like?
Maybe he's got a couple of tranny mates, too, living Upminster/Cranham. No wonder you're so vexed here.
Recommend one for him do you?
I've never needed counselling or trannies unlike you
The fact that you so quickly trigger yourself. pickled-style, on the very sight of an anonymous user name suggests that counselling is exactly what you do need. Probably along with a soapy massage from a tranny on the side, too.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 18:02
by Massive Attack
Didn't he sarcastically clap our crowd whilst nodding his head as he walked off the pitch at the end as his tiny brain rattled about in his numbskull? He needs sectioning.
The state of it..
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 17:57
by fraser
BoleynGone wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025, 17:50
Fraser
Go fuck yourself. If you went to your best mates funeral and some pratt started yelling and shouting about himself and all the problems he has you'll be calling him out and probably punch him.
he choose
Oh silly me I didn't realise we were at a funeral I thought it was a football match, you know players on a pitch getting frustrated with refs and opposition players etc.... I'd say trying to win a game too, but there wasn't much of that going on...
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 17:50
by BoleynGone
Fraser
Go fuck yourself. If you went to your best mates funeral and some pratt started yelling and shouting about himself and all the problems he has you'll be calling him out and probably punch him.
he choose
A multi millionaire and bless poor little snowflake who can't afford his own counselling...CՍNT
Has he taken your own appointment with a counsellor then? Jumped the queue, like?
Maybe he's got a couple of tranny mates, too, living Upminster/Cranham. No wonder you're so vexed here.
Recommend one for him do you?
I've never needed counselling or trannies unlike you
You clearly need both - especially the latter, given that you absolutely have to introduce them into every thread, totally disrespecting your fellow posters and their desire to stay on-topic..
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 15:16
by Massive Attack
Trivial pursuit question this one, the last time our creative superstar Paqueta assisted a goal was 58 games ago in all competitions against Newcastle 30/03/24 20 months ago.
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025, 14:46
Just 3 poxy goals and 0 assists - and 1 of them a Penalty that someone else won - in 12 Premier League games from our main superstar creative player. As well as on his 2nd suspension for the season before December having picked up his 7th yellow.
Utter fucking dogshit contribution without the threat of the FA to hide behind this time, off the back of a previous horrific season - 5 goals - 2 Penalties won by someone else - and 0 assists yet again.
A multi millionaire and bless poor little snowflake who can't afford his own counselling...CՍNT
Has he taken your own appointment with a counsellor then? Jumped the queue, like?
Maybe he's got a couple of tranny mates, too, living Upminster/Cranham. No wonder you're so vexed here.
Recommend one for him do you?
I've never needed counselling or trannies unlike you
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025, 14:46
Just 3 poxy goals and 0 assists - and 1 of them a Penalty that someone else won - in 12 Premier League games from our main superstar creative player. As well as on his 2nd suspension for the season before December having picked up his 7th yellow.
Utter fucking dogshit contribution without the threat of the FA to hide behind this time, off the back of a previous horrific season - 5 goals - 2 Penalties won by someone else - and 0 assists yet again.
A multi millionaire and bless poor little snowflake who can't afford his own counselling...CՍNT
Has he taken your own appointment with a counsellor then? Jumped the queue, like?
Maybe he's got a couple of tranny mates, too, living Upminster/Cranham. No wonder you're so vexed here.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 15:06
by Massive Attack
I think we should get at least £20M for him maybe £30M with add-ons. He has 1 and a half year left on his contract plus 1 year extra option. Feels like Payet all over again potentially leaving the Club in acrimonious circumstances whilst hurting us in the coffers when we've done little wrong other than pamper these precious cunts giving them everything both in support and money. They even get player liason wankers as well FFS! Just so fucking jarring when you put these 'dickheads' up against the career of Bonzo.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 15:01
by DukeofDevo
Who’s going to pay any serious money for him? Is he suddenly going to become a player with goals and assists in his game? Staying on his feet will be a start! Nunos has his work cut out in January!
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 14:57
by XKhammer
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025, 14:46
Just 3 poxy goals and 0 assists - and 1 of them a Penalty that someone else won - in 12 Premier League games from our main superstar creative player. As well as on his 2nd suspension for the season before December having picked up his 7th yellow.
Utter fucking dogshit contribution without the threat of the FA to hide behind this time, off the back of a previous horrific season - 5 goals - 2 Penalties won by someone else - and 0 assists yet again.
A multi millionaire and bless poor little snowflake who can't afford his own counselling...CՍNT
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 14:46
by Massive Attack
Just 3 poxy goals and 0 assists - and 1 of them a Penalty that someone else won - in 12 Premier League games from our main superstar creative player. As well as on his 2nd suspension for the season before December having picked up his 7th yellow.
Utter fucking dogshit contribution without the threat of the FA to hide behind this time, off the back of a previous horrific season - 5 goals - 2 Penalties won by someone else - and 0 assists yet again.
And of ALL days that's how he repays the faith the Club put in him by standing by his highly suspicious betting scandal.
It's done Paqueta, son. Time to move on so we can still get some money for you.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 14:44
by Mike Oxsaw
Seems like the PFA have now stepped in to offer him support. Bit late, but welcome nevertheless.
From my viewpoint, this was clearly political bollocks all along, led by one or more people with a personal political agenda. Strange that it all appeared on the brink of him moving to Manchester City.
Maybe our sponsors didn't want to lose one of "their" star players, maybe "others" were not comfortable about what he would bring to Manchester City and were determined to ensure that it never happened.
We'll never know for sure - deals/agreements probably made during a proverbial round of golf long far away from the 19th hole.
It's fucked up his life and he needs help back, whether or not he's still with us after the January window.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 14:34
by fraser
The things he's been accused of is way over the top, deliberately disrespecting Billy, wanting to make it all about himself... Some sausage calling others two-faced if they like him they don't have the right to be upset about Billy.
He acted like a cսnt Sunday and lost his shit, he should get some stick about it... I'm sure we've all acted irrationally and cuntishly in the heat of the moment when we shouldn't have, get the fuck over it.
Ron Eff" wrote: ↑30 Nov 2025, 19:56
I alluded to it on the match thread. Some of the decisions against him have been beyond harsh this season. The first yellow he got today is just not a yellow for an other player. No chance. You see players literally shout fuck off at refs and get no punishment. He just threw his arm in the air in frustration. Yes he shouldn’t have kicked off after, but these pricks are without a doubt looking for a reason to book him. It feels premeditated. Call it conspiracy if you like but I’ve thought it a few times.
He’s now put something on X to suggest that’s how he feels.
Yes he’s a multi millionaire footballer who should get a stiffer upper lip but that was a clear head loss and continued sarcastic messaging to the FA, and I do have a little bit of empathy. This is the same outfit that desperately tried to fit him up for two years without a shred of credible evidence. Why wouldn’t you believe there might be a continued agenda after he hired a legal team to make them look like a load of clowns?
I do agree with this actually. He doesn't do himself favours sometimes with theatrics but is treated like absolute dogshit by the refs. Barely ever gets a free kick and is always harshly penalised. Seems he very much has a target on his back when there are far worse offenders than him all over the division. Liverpool players did worse today and walked away with nothing. When (Diouf?) was just clearly pushed over in the first half, absolutely nothing given. That was ridiculous. Other players dive worse than him week in week out and if they have the right shirt on it's always a free kick. Other players are far dirtier than him and barely ever get booked for it. Doesn't excuse his stupidity yesterday but he's been a marked man for a while.
Fair points about the refereeing yesterday. But the reason he barely every gets a free kick is because of his diving reputation preceding him. If I was a ref I would be reluctant to give him anything either, even when it was a clear cut foul.
So you'd have to say he has a point then. Yes he's a diver but he's no worse than countless others.
After the David Coote saga, I have no doubt the refs absolutely cannot be relied upon to play it down the line and it wouldn't surprise me if there's a general feeling he's guilty but got away with it and a bit of a grudge toward him which is reflected in the way he's reffed.
Gary Strodders shank" wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025, 09:55
With regards to referees penalising him unfairly the biggest example of such discrimination was Di Canio who could be neigh on decapitated and still not be given a free kick.
This culminated in him sitting down in the centre circle begging to come off against Bradford.
As I remember rightly he had been denied two clear penalties which was waved away before sub Kitson ran in the box and fell over with nobody near him and got one.
Cue Di Canio getting up and trying to wrestle the ball away from BFF to take the pen.
High drama and entertaining but referees have their own agendas particularly when it comes to certain players and clubs.
Liverpool are allowed to get away with murder when it comes to play acting and I'm sure that is factored into the game management allowing them to break up the play dictate the pace and regroup when under pressure.
The refs by allowing this to occur are effectively facilitating cheating.
I'd be careful about calling is cheating, unless the term is applied further up the admin pyramid.
Refs are clearly under pressure to make sure that the media's (and hence the football administration's) preferred teams end up in Europe every season.
Leicester can never, ever, be allowed to happen again.
That's what 14 PL teams are up against now, every season.
Those who take the media's shilling will never openly state such though.
You know when l said you mainly post utter bollocks?
Like as on all your conquests in SE Asia, you mean
Gary Strodders shank" wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025, 09:55
With regards to referees penalising him unfairly the biggest example of such discrimination was Di Canio who could be neigh on decapitated and still not be given a free kick.
This culminated in him sitting down in the centre circle begging to come off against Bradford.
As I remember rightly he had been denied two clear penalties which was waved away before sub Kitson ran in the box and fell over with nobody near him and got one.
Cue Di Canio getting up and trying to wrestle the ball away from BFF to take the pen.
High drama and entertaining but referees have their own agendas particularly when it comes to certain players and clubs.
Liverpool are allowed to get away with murder when it comes to play acting and I'm sure that is factored into the game management allowing them to break up the play dictate the pace and regroup when under pressure.
The refs by allowing this to occur are effectively facilitating cheating.
I'd be careful about calling is cheating, unless the term is applied further up the admin pyramid.
Refs are clearly under pressure to make sure that the media's (and hence the football administration's) preferred teams end up in Europe every season.
Leicester can never, ever, be allowed to happen again.
That's what 14 PL teams are up against now, every season.
Those who take the media's shilling will never openly state such though.
You know when l said you mainly post utter bollocks?
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 10:18
by Mike Oxsaw
Gary Strodders shank" wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025, 09:55
With regards to referees penalising him unfairly the biggest example of such discrimination was Di Canio who could be neigh on decapitated and still not be given a free kick.
This culminated in him sitting down in the centre circle begging to come off against Bradford.
As I remember rightly he had been denied two clear penalties which was waved away before sub Kitson ran in the box and fell over with nobody near him and got one.
Cue Di Canio getting up and trying to wrestle the ball away from BFF to take the pen.
High drama and entertaining but referees have their own agendas particularly when it comes to certain players and clubs.
Liverpool are allowed to get away with murder when it comes to play acting and I'm sure that is factored into the game management allowing them to break up the play dictate the pace and regroup when under pressure.
The refs by allowing this to occur are effectively facilitating cheating.
I'd be careful about calling is cheating, unless the term is applied further up the admin pyramid.
Refs are clearly under pressure to make sure that the media's (and hence the football administration's) preferred teams end up in Europe every season.
Leicester can never, ever, be allowed to happen again.
That's what 14 PL teams are up against now, every season.
Those who take the media's shilling will never openly state such though.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 09:55
by Gary Strodders shank
With regards to referees penalising him unfairly the biggest example of such discrimination was Di Canio who could be neigh on decapitated and still not be given a free kick.
This culminated in him sitting down in the centre circle begging to come off against Bradford.
As I remember rightly he had been denied two clear penalties which was waved away before sub Kitson ran in the box and fell over with nobody near him and got one.
Cue Di Canio getting up and trying to wrestle the ball away from BFF to take the pen.
High drama and entertaining but referees have their own agendas particularly when it comes to certain players and clubs.
Liverpool are allowed to get away with murder when it comes to play acting and I'm sure that is factored into the game management allowing them to break up the play dictate the pace and regroup when under pressure.
The refs by allowing this to occur are effectively facilitating cheating.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 09:13
by Mike Oxsaw
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025, 07:46
Would certainly be looking to offload Paqueta and Potts in Jan.
Neither plays for spurs, so yet another vacuous statement attributed to your user name.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 07:59
by twoleftfeet
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025, 07:46
Would certainly be looking to offload Paqueta and Potts in Jan.
Re: Crapaqueta
Posted: 02 Dec 2025, 07:58
by Far Cough UKunt
Mad Ferret" wrote: ↑02 Dec 2025, 07:46
Would certainly be looking to offload Paqueta and Potts in Jan.
Outer Cape" wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025, 21:41
I'll drive him to the airport .... and I live in California for fuck's sake!
So you'd get rid of our most skilled player, when all our midfield dross is already on the bench every game? Who takes his place, Irvine? The Ward-Prowse can have Irvine's bench spot.
