AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
NFL (since 2016)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
- Posts: 10
- Old WHO Number: 264788
- Been liked: 1 time
NFL (since 2016)
"Free agency started last night and was pretty crazy some huge money being spent. Osweiler getting £18m a year for the Texans, leaving the Broncos without a QB, Giants have spent a fortune on good but not great players, Oliver Vernon has more guaranteed money than JJ Watt. lots more deals but cant be bothered to list them all."
-
- Posts: 204
- Old WHO Number: 212340
- Has liked: 17 times
- Been liked: 21 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Josh McDaniels is favourite for the Eagles HC job. Not a particularly exciting appointment.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3167
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 695 times
- Been liked: 1050 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
*mob* I've seen us throw picks at getting a QB before and it was a great decision until ngata's helmet connected with his knee and it was career over
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3167
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 695 times
- Been liked: 1050 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
"I think miami & my job are more ready for him but we have very little to offer in terms of draft position, so we're a no go. yes it's a lot to give up for him, and I'd stick with darnold if lawrence goes at 1. wilson's great but is he an instant upgrade from darnold? I doubt it, and you can fix other areas with those first round picks"
-
- Posts: 1158
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 242 times
- Been liked: 387 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
"Realistically, there are only three or four sides that can afford Watson at the sort of price people are talking about (a starting point of two first-rounders and at least one Day 2 pick, more likely two Day 2 picks, plus the huge salary hit). Washington is one of them. Jets have the picks and quite a bit of cap space, but I'd be surprised if the owners/GM have the balls. It's possible that his asking price will be two first-rounders, a third-rounder, fourth-rounder and scattered lower rounds, plus the deal which made him the second-highest paid player in NFL history. That's pretty much going all-in on one fella."
-
- Posts: 1158
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 242 times
- Been liked: 387 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
"I like Deshaun a lot - and think we should have drafted him in 2017 when we passed on him for Jamal Adams (look how that turned out). But I also think his price now is too high. We have the worst roster in the NFL and we need every high pick we currently own, to help rebuild the franchise from the bottom up. He's a fine QB, and most sides should jump at the chance of landing him. But we should stick with Darnold and supply him with some protection and some weapons. He's never had them. If we spent the asking price on Deshaun, we'd have neither the picks to provide him with offensive weapons, or the necessary cap room to build a better squad. Watson would also get frustrated in New York, because it's going to take a couple of years to build a decent side - and he's more than good enough to go to a 'win now' franchise. Personally, would love to have him at the Jets. But not sure it would be good for him or the franchise."
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3167
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 695 times
- Been liked: 1050 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
"looks like the situation in texas isn't improving and the jets could be the new favourite in a trade for him. makes sense as they have a young QB they could send the other way, and a couple of first round picks this year. bastards :.)"
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Should add i think his contract was up. And contracts in the nfl are a bit different with only so much money generally guaranteed and the rest of it if you stay there for the duration or play. Always confused me.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
"New england would still have been shit with brady as the rest of the team are currently wank and they didn't have a choice, as Brady wanted to leave to join a team where his ideas would be used, as basically belichek and the other coaches ignored his input. Not like footie, players can generally fuck off when they want as franchises realise its pointless keeping someone who doesn't want to be there."
Re: NFL (since 2016)
"Absolute amateur at this NFL, so are New England kicking themselves for allowing Brady to leave,and if he hadn't gone to the Buccs would they have made it to the semifinal."
-
- Posts: 1158
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 242 times
- Been liked: 387 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
"Went to bed early in third quarter of the Saints/Bucks game - and watched the rest of it this morning. That first half showed two ageing legends in decline. Second half was very different. Both have been phenomenal players, both still good QBs (incredible for their ages). But both now obviously on the tail compared to past capacity. Even Brady was failing to spot open receivers in the first half. Shame he never did that during the twenty years when he tortured us! Brady has enough in his legs for two more games. I don't doubt that. But it will be time after this season. It is for Brees, too, who deserves to go out on a gold throne for what he's done in Norlans."
-
- Posts: 10
- Old WHO Number: 264788
- Been liked: 1 time
Re: NFL (since 2016)
Brady has now beaten as many NFC teams in the playoffs as Brees. Pretty remarkable stat.
Re: NFL (since 2016)
"Brees retiring on a loss then. They've done well getting here, but he has looked his age this year and clearly hasn't aged as well as Brady. Having Gisele at home probably helps keep him fit!"
-
- Posts: 10
- Old WHO Number: 264788
- Been liked: 1 time
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3563
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 636 times
-
- Posts: 1158
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 242 times
- Been liked: 387 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
"Shame the Browns couldn't secure the comeback, but a good game. Left themselves too much to do in the second half. Chiefs losing Mahomes is huge. Hope the Saints win, but think it'll be the Buccs."
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3563
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 636 times
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3563
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 636 times
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3167
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 695 times
- Been liked: 1050 times
Re: NFL (since 2016)
makes you wonder what this Cleveland coach is watching. Hunt in a great rhythm so naturally he brings back a rusty Chubb