Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

NFL (since 2016)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
crystal falace
Posts: 10
Old WHO Number: 264788
Been liked: 1 time

NFL (since 2016)

Post crystal falace »

"Free agency started last night and was pretty crazy some huge money being spent. Osweiler getting £18m a year for the Texans, leaving the Broncos without a QB, Giants have spent a fortune on good but not great players, Oliver Vernon has more guaranteed money than JJ Watt. lots more deals but cant be bothered to list them all."
JustAFatKevinDavies
Posts: 6

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post JustAFatKevinDavies »

I hope your plane home smashes into the Atlantic
stewie griffin
Posts: 395
Old WHO Number: 34559
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 46 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post stewie griffin »

"Great night at the Linc. Not the result anyone at the league wanted which makes it even sweeter. The omissions of Sirianni from the coach of the year shortlist (just won 69-14 the last two weeks against two who are on there) and Haason Reddick from defensive player of the year are laughably stupid and the continued obsession with 'sexy' teams is becoming an embarrassment. Still, not as embarrassing as the 9ers behaviour in the second half of yet another Shanahan failure in a big game. Lost with all the class and good grace of Spurs on.a bad day. Been the best all round team in the league all season, just a question now whether we can stop mahomes and kelce. Best team against the best players, should be a good game."
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1155
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 242 times
Been liked: 386 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post southbankbornnbred »

"The Superbowl should be a good game - two well-matched sides, in theory. Mahomes is superb, even with ankle knack. Eagles look really solid all round. Going to get interesting."
Oh dear
Posts: 53
Old WHO Number: 21613

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post Oh dear »

That Burrows throw for the first Bengal TD was something else.
nerd
Posts: 89
Old WHO Number: 209803

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post nerd »

"Bengals 20 v Chiefs 23 now that was a game , lived upto its billing ."
Nutsin
Posts: 2552
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 154 times
Been liked: 252 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post Nutsin »

Niners o line couldn't protect their QB's. Philly D line won the game for Philly. Niners inside o line got man handled.
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1155
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 242 times
Been liked: 386 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post southbankbornnbred »

"Christ, the 49ers we're going through QBs so quickly I thought Ken Dorsey was going to make a comeback. Easy pickings for a strong Eagles side."
nerd
Posts: 89
Old WHO Number: 209803

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post nerd »

Arrowhead atmosphere so good at the start of this one.
Hermit Road
Posts: 204
Old WHO Number: 212340
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 21 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post Hermit Road »

That was an absolute beat down. That Eagles pass rush is devastating and means that Purdy needs a new arm. You could say it's bad luck but Purdys arm didn't fuck itself up. One thing a lot of people didn't realise about the birds is that their offence can do everything. Take away the run and they'll pass you to death. Take away the pass and they'll run right through you.
nerd
Posts: 89
Old WHO Number: 209803

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post nerd »

AFC championship surely going to be a cracker
Grumpster
Posts: 174
Old WHO Number: 19452
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 45 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post Grumpster »

"Can't plan for having every single QB injured, as I doubt its happened very often in history. Unfortunately with one team having no functioning QB from the 5th minute onwards, made it a pretty boring game. Neither of these teams would beat the mobs in the other game even if fit I don't think."
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1672
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 205 times
Been liked: 157 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post zebthecat »

Well that's me told on predictions. The odds of both QBs getting crocked must be pretty high but you'd have thought their would be some disaster planning.
User avatar
Takashi Miike
Posts: 3164
Old WHO Number: 233644
Has liked: 695 times
Been liked: 1048 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post Takashi Miike »

we had him during jay gruden's final year. we also had mark sanchez that season üòÇ
LeroysBoots
Posts: 446
Old WHO Number: 10197
Has liked: 11 times
Been liked: 19 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post LeroysBoots »

Should be a fairly easy 2nd half for Eagles
Grumpster
Posts: 174
Old WHO Number: 19452
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 45 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post Grumpster »

This johnson is fantastically atrocious. If hornchurch had a team he wouldn't even be good enough for them!!
Grumpster
Posts: 174
Old WHO Number: 19452
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 45 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post Grumpster »

"1st TD should never have happened and now on our 4th choice TD, good times üòÇ All over then and at least we're in good shape for next season."
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1672
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 205 times
Been liked: 157 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post zebthecat »

Here we go 49ers (although I'd like to see the Eagles win) and Bengals I reckon.
Far Cough
Posts: 2593
Old WHO Number: 34087
Been liked: 1 time

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post Far Cough »

I consider Tarkenton a dyed in the wool Minnesota Viking even though he went to the Giants for a while but yes he did make a comeback with us
Oh dear
Posts: 53
Old WHO Number: 21613

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post Oh dear »

Far Cough 1:10 Thu Jan 26 Fran Tarkerton - 2nd spell
MrTrentReznor
Posts: 56
Old WHO Number: 13636

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post MrTrentReznor »

The majority of a RBs ball carrying plays result in him being violently tackled by a much bigger player or players. Unless he gets out of play or scores the play ends harshly for a RB. On a passing play he usually has to block a much bigger player. Not easy being a NFL rb.
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1672
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 205 times
Been liked: 157 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post zebthecat »

Running QBs are bound to have a shorter career especially ones who are prepared to take on the defence rather than slide. Cam Newton springs to mind. I remember reading that the average NFL career for running backs is just a bit over 2 and half years. Those collisions with linemen and linebackers are going to hurt.
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3562
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 632 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post Lee Trundle »

"Jimmy G was playing pretty solid before he got injured. His QB rating was 103, which is up there with the best. He's easily good enough for the play offs, but similar to Alex Smith, I never felt either of them had it in them to win the SB."
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1155
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 242 times
Been liked: 386 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post southbankbornnbred »

"Surely Jackson is going to stay in Baltimore? Would love him in New York, but can't see him joining us. Baltimore will surely pay him some crazy amount to keep him? Although, his style must give head coaches a fucking heart attack every time he plays. The guy full-on runs INTO huge linebackers. His last two seasons have ended in injury, partly because of that on-the-move style. It's great to watch, of course, and I love him. But he is always an injury waiting to happen. Not sure how long he can play that way in the NFL. But he'll be amazing to watch while he does."
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1672
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 205 times
Been liked: 157 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post zebthecat »

Lamar Jackson might be available. Not sure he'd be a fit for the Jets but he'd be a huge upgrade.
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1155
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 242 times
Been liked: 386 times

Re: NFL (since 2016)

Post southbankbornnbred »

"Trunds, Yeah, I do think we should go for Jimmy. I know he's not a great QB, whereas Rodgers so obviously is (was?). But Jimmy G's record is decent (41-17 as a starter, albeit in a side that had a strong defense) and by not overspending on a huge name like Rodgers or Jackson, we'd be able to retain and pay genuine upcoming stars like Sauce, Garret Wilson and Williams. In the meantime, Zach Wilson or some other backup would get some time to develop properly away from the white heat of the first team (and the Milfs who hang around it!). Jets have finally got to start thinking about becoming a proper NFL franchise that considers succession planning etc. Our clueless owners have never thought that way. High time they started to do so - and we finally have the base to build on at the moment. A huge trade for a 40-year-old Rodgers (no matter how good he is) would begin to unpick that decent position."
Post Reply