Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
Come On You Irons
Posts: 741
Old WHO Number: 304394
Has liked: 22 times
Been liked: 99 times

The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Come On You Irons »

There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
Hammer I am
Posts: 323
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 76 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

haha, it's even worse than I thought, I see the latest update is the proposed "peace" deal involves the US effectively keeping half of Ukraine's mineral wealth.

Putin and Trump have agreed to carve up Ukraine amongst themselves then. the whole think stank when Ukraine wasn't invited to talks, I wonder why
Hammer I am
Posts: 323
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 76 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

Jaan Kenbrovin" wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 22:21
Nutsin wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 20:35 Looks like we could see the end of the Ukraine war. Sooner the better!

Wonder what changed?
Maybe not, if Starmer and the EU fuckwits have their way. They seem convinced Putin not only wants to conquer Europe but also somehow could - so it's better to use Ukraine in 'operation human shield', until the last Ukrainian breathes his or her last breath.

It's horrific to think how much suffering has happened to only settle for a deal worse than the one that was almost agreed in the first few months of the war. All those lives lost from pushing the little guy repeatedly into the bully.
Typical Putin apologist drivel, it's inevitable the peace deal the US and Russia propose will involve Putin keeping all the territory he wanted anyway, Ukraine will reject it (why shouldn't they) and the Eu and UK will likely support them.

Don't pretend you're thinking about Ukrainian lives while you fellate Putin and Trump Jaan
Last edited by Hammer I am on 18 Feb 2025, 09:35, edited 1 time in total.
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1113
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 52 times
Been liked: 241 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

Nutsin wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 20:35 Looks like we could see the end of the Ukraine war. Sooner the better!

Wonder what changed?
Maybe not, if Starmer and the EU fuckwits have their way. They seem convinced Putin not only wants to conquer Europe but also somehow could - so it's better to use Ukraine in 'operation human shield', until the last Ukrainian breathes his or her last breath.

It's horrific to think how much suffering has happened to only settle for a deal worse than the one that was almost agreed in the first few months of the war. All those lives lost from pushing the little guy repeatedly into the bully.
User avatar
Cabbige Savage
Posts: 255
Has liked: 255 times
Been liked: 273 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Cabbige Savage »

Send elite sub Saharan parryshoot rejjyment to Ukraine 

User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 802
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 447 times
Been liked: 293 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

Nutsin wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 21:20
MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 20:57
Nutsin wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 20:51
You sound cynical mate! 
I am mate.
The orange one (and no, I'm not a hater) seems to be quite happy to fuck off America's allies.
I do wonder how that'll turn out when the old allies realise that siding with the yanks really isn't worth the ag.
Less Chryslers on the streets of London, no bad thing.
As a US tax payer I see things differently.
Fair enough, I respect that.
Nutsin
Posts: 2558
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 157 times
Been liked: 252 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 20:57
Nutsin wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 20:51
MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 20:43
 
An American President who's prepared to rim Putin?
You sound cynical mate! 
I am mate.
The orange one (and no, I'm not a hater) seems to be quite happy to fuck off America's allies.
I do wonder how that'll turn out when the old allies realise that siding with the yanks really isn't worth the ag.
Less Chryslers on the streets of London, no bad thing.
As a US tax payer I see things differently.
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 802
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 447 times
Been liked: 293 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

Nutsin wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 20:51
MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 20:43
Nutsin wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 20:35
Wonder what changed?
 
An American President who's prepared to rim Putin?
You sound cynical mate! 
I am mate.
The orange one (and no, I'm not a hater) seems to be quite happy to fuck off America's allies.
I do wonder how that'll turn out when the old allies realise that siding with the yanks really isn't worth the ag.
Less Chryslers on the streets of London, no bad thing.
Nutsin
Posts: 2558
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 157 times
Been liked: 252 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 20:43
Nutsin wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 20:35
Wonder what changed?
 
An American President who's prepared to rim Putin?
You sound cynical mate! 
nerd2
Posts: 48
Has liked: 2 times
Been liked: 35 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post nerd2 »

Trumps mouth designed for blowing stronger men it seems
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 802
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 447 times
Been liked: 293 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

Nutsin wrote: 17 Feb 2025, 20:35
Wonder what changed?
 
 
An American President who's prepared to rim Putin?
Nutsin
Posts: 2558
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 157 times
Been liked: 252 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

Looks like we could see the end of the Ukraine war. Sooner the better!

Wonder what changed?
ironsofcanada
Posts: 535
Old WHO Number: 18101
Has liked: 129 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post ironsofcanada »

Nutsin wrote: 14 Feb 2025, 23:23 J D Vance is setting the cat amongst the pigeons with his criticism of the Euro Zone and UK policies on immigration and the attack of freedom of speach.

They have a point of course. It’ll be interesting to see how much pressure, if any they apply for change.

Change could be on the horizon.

 
 
I was very wrong on Vance, I was thinking Vivek or Gabbard and chosing him was a lost opportunity.

He performed so well in the campaign against hostile interviewers and that was legitimately a good political speech.
Nutsin
Posts: 2558
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 157 times
Been liked: 252 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Nutsin »

J D Vance is setting the cat amongst the pigeons with his criticism of the Euro Zone and UK policies on immigration and the attack of freedom of speach.

They have a point of course. It’ll be interesting to see how much pressure, if any they apply for change.

Change could be on the horizon.
 
Pub Bigot
Posts: 643
Old WHO Number: 255703
Has liked: 723 times
Been liked: 289 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Pub Bigot »

Takashi Miike" wrote: 12 Feb 2025, 09:37
They can’t even string a coherent sentence together. Their lack of intelligence and ideological beliefs make them dangerous, and we can thank the wonderful Tories and Labour for allowing large numbers of these people to move in on mass and destabilise society with their dogma and victim mentality, aided and abetted by said parties. 
THUNDERCLINT
Posts: 770
Been liked: 186 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post THUNDERCLINT »

So, Gaza...just a pure thought experiment, how long realistically to make it habitable?

UN numbers estimate 160,000 residential building destroyed, 275,000 severely or partially damaged. 90% of the house stock as best I can tell. Home to 1,800,000 million?

I'd guess all supporting infrastructure is fucked and given the amount of terrorist tunnelling much groundwork will be needed to fix that.  

So, the whole place is essentially gone at this point. We still had some areas of London undeveloped after the blitz visible in the 80's.

Rebuilding the place even to the shithole it was, 2 generations at  least. No population can survive in those conditions for 50 years, they'll be dead of cholera, typhoid etc long before.

There's no need to forcibly remove anyone, 6 months time when reality hits home anyone with any sense will leave.

If you're Gazan the best case scenario is the US deems all residents equal stakeholders of the land and then negotiates a buy out so they can resettle elsewhere with enough capital to put a roof over their heads and support any family.
 
User avatar
Manuel
Posts: 4111
Location: The Very Far East
Old WHO Number: 300109
Has liked: 137 times
Been liked: 438 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Manuel »

IF the apple story is true I suspect they will tell Starmer to fuck off and pull out of the UK. I seem to remember a similar thing happening with whatsapp a few years ago,
Jaan Kenbrovin
Posts: 1113
Old WHO Number: 269499
Has liked: 52 times
Been liked: 241 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Jaan Kenbrovin »

Claims of Labour ditching their online safety act over Trumps tariffs. Hopefully the Chagos deal gets scuppered next and Starmer gets a full labour revolt for being such a pointless fanny.
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5037
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 424 times
Been liked: 868 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Mr Anon" wrote: 10 Feb 2025, 15:19
goose wrote: 09 Feb 2025, 17:04
Mr Anon" wrote: 09 Feb 2025, 14:02
If you read Trump's statements in full he makes no mention of them going back, just living in peace in neighbouring countries, while the US will occupy it and turn it into the "Riviera of the Middle East" I suspect perhaps you might have read someone in his staff or one of his less unhinged supporters attempt to walk Trumps statements back do a degree of something not so mental sounding!

I'm sure on his head it sounded good, but he must be barking if he thinks they're willingly going to leave now.

His main political stance is consistently America first and no foreign aid, so why would his plan be to spend billions doing it up, then hand it back to the Palestinians?
they're not doing it for free are they?
there will be lucrative contracts for US businesses in the rebuilding, and then US businesses when the place becomes a functioning destination for people to live/visit.
free or not is a moot point now, he's confirmed in his most recent interview that the Palestinians will not have a right to return, and the US will own it outright
I’ve not seen that. Be good if you could share it.
I’d assume the US would want ownership of some land, either as US property or belonging to US business. Then the land gets sold or rented. If the original occupants are getting a brand new house for free I don’t see the problem. If it’s different to that then I see the issue.
Mr Anon
Posts: 651
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 136 times
Been liked: 152 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Mr Anon »

goose wrote: 09 Feb 2025, 17:04
Mr Anon" wrote: 09 Feb 2025, 14:02
goose wrote: 09 Feb 2025, 13:01
The way I understand it is that they’re not being deported, but offered an alternative until it’s rebuilt and then they go back.
If you read Trump's statements in full he makes no mention of them going back, just living in peace in neighbouring countries, while the US will occupy it and turn it into the "Riviera of the Middle East" I suspect perhaps you might have read someone in his staff or one of his less unhinged supporters attempt to walk Trumps statements back do a degree of something not so mental sounding!

I'm sure on his head it sounded good, but he must be barking if he thinks they're willingly going to leave now.

His main political stance is consistently America first and no foreign aid, so why would his plan be to spend billions doing it up, then hand it back to the Palestinians?
they're not doing it for free are they?
there will be lucrative contracts for US businesses in the rebuilding, and then US businesses when the place becomes a functioning destination for people to live/visit.
free or not is a moot point now, he's confirmed in his most recent interview that the Palestinians will not have a right to return, and the US will own it outright
Hammer I am
Posts: 323
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 76 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

No they can't, that's the problem if there was a valid threat, if there was a legitimate threat and the courts deemed it important to access, currently no one could help anyway 

 
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 1375
Has liked: 342 times
Been liked: 556 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Far Cough UKunt »

Pub Bigot" wrote: 10 Feb 2025, 13:25 Apples Ordered by the UK Government to let it access users' encrypted dataWho does the UK government think it is to demand from a brand like Apple to that allow access to users's encrypted data in the UK and abroad? There's every chance that Apple will tell the UK government to swing, and rightly so. Worst case, Apple doesn't comply and stops selling its products in the UK. 

This is government overreach, probably under the guise of some sort harebrained way of tracking terrorists or enemies of the state in their case, while being able to snoop at anyone's data. 

Kier Starmer is an absolute rotten cսnt, and heads a rotten party. They can fuck off, and anyone of the opinion 'well if you've got nothing to hide.' 
 
 
Apparently, Apple can't see users encrypted data anyway?
Hammer I am
Posts: 323
Old WHO Number: 22726
Has liked: 76 times
Been liked: 69 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Hammer I am »

Its not quite as you made it sound though, they would still need a court order to access an individual's data, they wouldnt be given access to freely look at any and all person's data, so absolutely no different than it is now with pretty much everything else

They just asking for ADP to be at a level where its possible to decrypt if it was court approved, currently that wouldnt be possible.

US government has also asked for this a few years back.

not that I agree with the above but just giving context, and what with the likes of PRISM, a much bigger overeach in breaching people's privacy then surely every party is as rotten another, they're all the same 
Pub Bigot
Posts: 643
Old WHO Number: 255703
Has liked: 723 times
Been liked: 289 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post Pub Bigot »

Apples Ordered by the UK Government to let it access users' encrypted dataWho does the UK government think it is to demand from a brand like Apple to that allow access to users's encrypted data in the UK and abroad? There's every chance that Apple will tell the UK government to swing, and rightly so. Worst case, Apple doesn't comply and stops selling its products in the UK. 

This is government overreach, probably under the guise of some sort harebrained way of tracking terrorists or enemies of the state in their case, while being able to snoop at anyone's data. 

Kier Starmer is an absolute rotten cսnt, and heads a rotten party. They can fuck off, and anyone of the opinion 'well if you've got nothing to hide.' 
User avatar
goose
Posts: 5037
Old WHO Number: 212806
Has liked: 424 times
Been liked: 868 times

Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)

Post goose »

Mr Anon" wrote: 09 Feb 2025, 14:02
goose wrote: 09 Feb 2025, 13:01
Hammer I am" wrote: 09 Feb 2025, 12:09
Think you're not understanding Nutsin, not very unusual for you.

The ethic cleansing part is not the israel attacks to dislodge HAMAS, it's Trump's suggestion to deport the population of Gaza and turn it into a holiday resort. I mean thats a perfect literal example of of ethnic cleansing.

You'd have to be some kind of moron to think otherwise so crack on Nutsin
The way I understand it is that they’re not being deported, but offered an alternative until it’s rebuilt and then they go back.
If you read Trump's statements in full he makes no mention of them going back, just living in peace in neighbouring countries, while the US will occupy it and turn it into the "Riviera of the Middle East" I suspect perhaps you might have read someone in his staff or one of his less unhinged supporters attempt to walk Trumps statements back do a degree of something not so mental sounding!

I'm sure on his head it sounded good, but he must be barking if he thinks they're willingly going to leave now.

His main political stance is consistently America first and no foreign aid, so why would his plan be to spend billions doing it up, then hand it back to the Palestinians?
they're not doing it for free are they?
there will be lucrative contracts for US businesses in the rebuilding, and then US businesses when the place becomes a functioning destination for people to live/visit.
Post Reply