AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Fab to return.
- RootsRadical
- Posts: 898
- Old WHO Number: 321614
- Has liked: 39 times
- Been liked: 155 times
Re: Fab to return.
Gank wrote: ↑11 Sep 2025, 01:53 We really are pathetic. Areola was here the whole time, ahead of Fabianski and Foderingham. Then we decide Fabianski is past it but Areola isn't good enough for Potter so we drop all that money on Mads who turns out to be worse than all of them, and rather than swallow some pride and put Areola, the best of a bad bunch, back in as number one, we re-sign someone we already said was his number two but STILL keep Mads and Foderingham. Insanity. Apart from having FOUR first team goalkeepers, something no other top flight club has ever done in this country to my knowledge, what message does this send to any of the younger goalies at the club? We may as well not have any, it's ridiculous.
Foderingham has gone?
Re: Fab to return.
We really are pathetic. Areola was here the whole time, ahead of Fabianski and Foderingham. Then we decide Fabianski is past it but Areola isn't good enough for Potter so we drop all that money on Mads who turns out to be worse than all of them, and rather than swallow some pride and put Areola, the best of a bad bunch, back in as number one, we re-sign someone we already said was his number two but STILL keep Mads and Foderingham. Insanity. Apart from having FOUR first team goalkeepers, something no other top flight club has ever done in this country to my knowledge, what message does this send to any of the younger goalies at the club? We may as well not have any, it's ridiculous.
-
- Posts: 3344
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 56 times
- Been liked: 409 times
Re: Fab to return.
Foderingham is going to Cyprus where the transfer window is still open
Is Saudi still open? Can they PLEASE take Rodriguez if so
Said last season that even at 40 Fabianski looked capable of playing another season as no2
There wasn’t a massive difference between him & Areola when he played last season
Is Saudi still open? Can they PLEASE take Rodriguez if so
Said last season that even at 40 Fabianski looked capable of playing another season as no2
There wasn’t a massive difference between him & Areola when he played last season
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 1639
- Has liked: 171 times
- Been liked: 276 times
Re: Fab to return.
I’m actually surprised no one snapped up Fab over the summer.
Maybe he was being selective, as he wanted to stay in London.
Maybe he was being selective, as he wanted to stay in London.
-
- Posts: 8
- Been liked: 5 times
Re: Fab to return.
Was foderingham not under contract ? Since he left after window had closed .
why didnt we just keep fabianski in the first place ?
i suppose Sullivan has saved 3 months salary since.
what a fucking clown act
why didnt we just keep fabianski in the first place ?
i suppose Sullivan has saved 3 months salary since.
what a fucking clown act
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 1639
- Has liked: 171 times
- Been liked: 276 times
Re: Fab to return.
the coming of gary" wrote: ↑10 Sep 2025, 17:31 on telly i saw a fat, washed up, ex - manager called Wayne Rooney
Still, he's younger than Fabianski
.
Rooney’s younger than Ronaldo, who’ll be starting CF for Portugal at the World Cup next summer.
A shame Rooney didn’t look after himself better, as he could’ve surely had a good couple of extra seasons before hanging up his boots.
A shame Rooney didn’t look after himself better, as he could’ve surely had a good couple of extra seasons before hanging up his boots.
-
- Posts: 321
- Old WHO Number: 14200
- Has liked: 57 times
- Been liked: 77 times
Re: Fab to return.
on telly i saw a fat, washed up, ex - manager called Wayne Rooney
Still, he's younger than Fabianski
.
Still, he's younger than Fabianski
.
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3563
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 636 times
- Tomshardware
- Posts: 847
- Old WHO Number: 266280
- Has liked: 261 times
- Been liked: 127 times
-
- Posts: 741
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 22 times
- Been liked: 99 times
Re: Fab to return.
He's confirmed as returned on the OS.
What a shambles of a club. Very circus like.
What a shambles of a club. Very circus like.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 1375
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 556 times
-
- Posts: 741
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 22 times
- Been liked: 99 times
Re: Fab to return.
Yes. It wouldn't surprise me.
What a circus the club is under Sullivan, Brady, Noble and the rest of the board.
What a circus the club is under Sullivan, Brady, Noble and the rest of the board.
- Far Cough UKunt
- Posts: 1375
- Has liked: 342 times
- Been liked: 556 times
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 1639
- Has liked: 171 times
- Been liked: 276 times
Re: Fab to return.
Pub Bigot" wrote: ↑09 Sep 2025, 11:00 The club done this before with Carlton Cole, under the stewardship of the two geniuses, so it’s not a surprise.
He should have been given another year or two anyway. People are fitter and stronger than ever, and it won’t be long before you see players playing up to 50. I reckon Ronaldo will do it.
Ain’t there a Jap stiker who’s about 50 odd still playing.
Re: Fab to return.
The club done this before with Carlton Cole, under the stewardship of the two geniuses, so it’s not a surprise.
He should have been given another year or two anyway. People are fitter and stronger than ever, and it won’t be long before you see players playing up to 50. I reckon Ronaldo will do it.
He should have been given another year or two anyway. People are fitter and stronger than ever, and it won’t be long before you see players playing up to 50. I reckon Ronaldo will do it.
-
- Posts: 346
- Old WHO Number: 276654
- Has liked: 186 times
- Been liked: 41 times
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 3156
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 124 times
- Been liked: 747 times
Re: Fab to return.
I like Fab. Seems a great bloke and a good keeper, pleased to see him back and I doubt he sees the field so I wonder if this is part coaching, but fuck me we are comically and embarrassingly dysfunctional.
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 4504
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 29 times
- Been liked: 519 times
Re: Fab to return.
Outrageous!!! Wasn't there a cheaper option available? No wonder we're fucking broke.