AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Converting players…
-
threesixty
- Posts: 960
- Old WHO Number: 14819
- Has liked: 133 times
- Been liked: 257 times
Converting players…
I’ve always been impressed by a managers ability to convert players from 1 position to another and solve problems. Joe Linton from striker to midfield general etc..
Who would be a candidate for that in our team?
My shout would be AWB to Central Midfielder. Given that we have KWP who can play RB.
I just think he has the skill, can time tackles very well (better than anyone on the team) and has pace.
Everything we lack in the midfield.
Who else?
Who would be a candidate for that in our team?
My shout would be AWB to Central Midfielder. Given that we have KWP who can play RB.
I just think he has the skill, can time tackles very well (better than anyone on the team) and has pace.
Everything we lack in the midfield.
Who else?
-
southbankbornnbred
- Posts: 1495
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 376 times
- Been liked: 567 times
Re: Converting players…
But Frank had already played a few games upfront in Scotland. Which is why Lyall, who knew what he was doing, pushed him up there after Goddard's injury.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 6599
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3789 times
- Been liked: 1985 times
Re: Converting players…
Bilic first played him there and Pellegrini developed him even further. Fuck all to do with Moyes and he admitted that himself upon his return stating to Rice "Fuck me you got good!".
- Mad Ferret
- Posts: 1869
- Has liked: 186 times
- Been liked: 311 times
Re: Converting players…
Massive Attack" wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 16:56 Declan Rice from an alright Centre Half in to an outstanding Defensive Midfielder.
Thank you, Mr Moyes.
- Massive Attack
- Posts: 6599
- Old WHO Number: 321955
- Has liked: 3789 times
- Been liked: 1985 times
Re: Converting players…
Declan Rice from an alright Centre Half in to an outstanding Defensive Midfielder.
-
Jaan Kenbrovin
- Posts: 1208
- Old WHO Number: 269499
- Has liked: 67 times
- Been liked: 296 times
Re: Converting players…w
Interesting discussion about Paqueta, converting players and shows our desperation.
IMHO Paqueta is a number 8 lying a bit deeper with a little bit more space and time and not with his back to goal. He plays as no 8 for Brazil and was a standout player for Lyon when he played there as he can contribute defensively and is physically strong enough to win the ball and protect it.
In terms of converting players, agree its probably AWB or, at a stretch, “Pot Head” Todibo to provide some speed, athleticism, strength in centre mid to plug that chasm Rice left. Its the abject failure in replacing Rice that has cost us more than anything else IMO. Yes inadequate / disasterous transfer business in the striker and CB areas has also impacted but our drubbings and games like Monday night showed how non existent our central midfield is. If Nuno leaves that area with less than 3 in there he is yet another who is gettingbpaud a lot of money but lacks the ability to “see the bleedin obvious”. Compact, combative midfields win games as they get and keep the ball and its where most of the game is played. A strong midfield cuts out a lot of the dangers ( crosses, passes thru the lines etc) before they become a problem to the defence.
Will Nuno convert someone to solve issues other than a false 9 ( which has never worked ) ? I highly doubt it. He’s a bit too conservative usually although if last Monday is anything to go by… maybe not
IMHO Paqueta is a number 8 lying a bit deeper with a little bit more space and time and not with his back to goal. He plays as no 8 for Brazil and was a standout player for Lyon when he played there as he can contribute defensively and is physically strong enough to win the ball and protect it.
In terms of converting players, agree its probably AWB or, at a stretch, “Pot Head” Todibo to provide some speed, athleticism, strength in centre mid to plug that chasm Rice left. Its the abject failure in replacing Rice that has cost us more than anything else IMO. Yes inadequate / disasterous transfer business in the striker and CB areas has also impacted but our drubbings and games like Monday night showed how non existent our central midfield is. If Nuno leaves that area with less than 3 in there he is yet another who is gettingbpaud a lot of money but lacks the ability to “see the bleedin obvious”. Compact, combative midfields win games as they get and keep the ball and its where most of the game is played. A strong midfield cuts out a lot of the dangers ( crosses, passes thru the lines etc) before they become a problem to the defence.
Will Nuno convert someone to solve issues other than a false 9 ( which has never worked ) ? I highly doubt it. He’s a bit too conservative usually although if last Monday is anything to go by… maybe not
-
threesixty
- Posts: 960
- Old WHO Number: 14819
- Has liked: 133 times
- Been liked: 257 times
Re: Converting players…
The issue is we can’t afford ready made great players who are not semi permanently on the injury table or are about 100 yrs old.
We also can’t afford in a relegation scrap to bed in the kids now (Marshall looked like a child playing his first game yesterday).
I don’t want us to buy more shitty players out of desperation in Jan.
so we have to do something?
Our midfield and defenders are just really really bad.
I find it crazy that we let Aguerd and Emerson go and they are now half of Marseilles’s defence that’s top of the french league, 6 points clear of last years CL winners PSG!
we must look within out team and repurpose and get the best use out of our players somehow.
We also can’t afford in a relegation scrap to bed in the kids now (Marshall looked like a child playing his first game yesterday).
I don’t want us to buy more shitty players out of desperation in Jan.
so we have to do something?
Our midfield and defenders are just really really bad.
I find it crazy that we let Aguerd and Emerson go and they are now half of Marseilles’s defence that’s top of the french league, 6 points clear of last years CL winners PSG!
we must look within out team and repurpose and get the best use out of our players somehow.
-
southbankbornnbred
- Posts: 1495
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 376 times
- Been liked: 567 times
Re: Converting players…
Or, to put it more simply, you can coach total football when you have the likes of Cryuff, Neeskens, Haan, Gullit, Rijkaard, Koeman and Van Basten.
We have Max Kilman.
We have Max Kilman.
-
southbankbornnbred
- Posts: 1495
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 376 times
- Been liked: 567 times
Re: Converting players…
threesixty wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 14:56southbankbornnbred wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 13:47 Under the right manager, and with a decent set of defenders around him, AWB is a top-class right back.
He was exposed against Chelsea - his worst game for us - simply because our defence is so porous that their midfield and attack were creating overloads at will. Too often, AWB was asked to keep track of two runners - and he go no help from a slow, immobile midfield.
He played badly that day, but I defy any right back to play well alongside those centre halves, and that central midfield, all season.
What I'm saying is: why change him to midfield? Play your best players in their best positions. If you do that all over the pitch, you'll have less need to panic and start experimenting with defenders in midfield and midfielders in attack.
We need to do the basics well first, before fannying around. That's the lesson of Monday night. Nuno was trying to be too clever too soon.
Friday night, one to eleven, play your best players in each position. Paqueta is Brazil's #8. Don't start him as a centre forward etc.It’s not that I think he’s better in midfield. I think our choice of midfielders is shit and he being an all round better footballer than all our midfielders means the team could benefit with a change in position. More importantly, KWP isn’t bad at RB so you end up having 2 pretty good players in the 11.
in this league having someone who is a dedicated midfielder (JWP or Andy Irving) doesn’t solve your problems automatically if they are just shit players. Under no circumstances would you even dream of playing those 2 as RB or any other position. Which says a lot about the quality of AVB and any player we can identify that can play multiple positions competently.
Finally, I’m an idealist I suppose. And Cruyffs ideas of total football where everyone can play any position is actually a good thing rather than always specialised players. I like the idea that if you can control a ball well you should be useful all
over the pitch. You can teach positioning. But control, tackling, speed .. u need to have it.
But it's harder to teach positioning to somebody who has never played as a central midfielder while his team is in a relegation dogfight and you can't afford the mistakes that get made while people are learning.
AWB has never played in central midfield. He's a good right back. Play him at right back. We don't need the distraction of mucking good players around in pursuit of an idealistic "total football" dream that gets us relegated.
Everybody likes the idea of total football. But you try coaching that ahead of an away game at Elland Road on a Friday night. Good luck!
AWB has never played in central midfield. He's a good right back. Play him at right back. We don't need the distraction of mucking good players around in pursuit of an idealistic "total football" dream that gets us relegated.
Everybody likes the idea of total football. But you try coaching that ahead of an away game at Elland Road on a Friday night. Good luck!
-
threesixty
- Posts: 960
- Old WHO Number: 14819
- Has liked: 133 times
- Been liked: 257 times
Re: Converting players…
southbankbornnbred wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 13:47 Under the right manager, and with a decent set of defenders around him, AWB is a top-class right back.
He was exposed against Chelsea - his worst game for us - simply because our defence is so porous that their midfield and attack were creating overloads at will. Too often, AWB was asked to keep track of two runners - and he go no help from a slow, immobile midfield.
He played badly that day, but I defy any right back to play well alongside those centre halves, and that central midfield, all season.
What I'm saying is: why change him to midfield? Play your best players in their best positions. If you do that all over the pitch, you'll have less need to panic and start experimenting with defenders in midfield and midfielders in attack.
We need to do the basics well first, before fannying around. That's the lesson of Monday night. Nuno was trying to be too clever too soon.
Friday night, one to eleven, play your best players in each position. Paqueta is Brazil's #8. Don't start him as a centre forward etc.
It’s not that I think he’s better in midfield. I think our choice of midfielders is shit and he being an all round better footballer than all our midfielders means the team could benefit with a change in position. More importantly, KWP isn’t bad at RB so you end up having 2 pretty good players in the 11.
in this league having someone who is a dedicated midfielder (JWP or Andy Irving) doesn’t solve your problems automatically if they are just shit players. Under no circumstances would you even dream of playing those 2 as RB or any other position. Which says a lot about the quality of AVB and any player we can identify that can play multiple positions competently.
Finally, I’m an idealist I suppose. And Cruyffs ideas of total football where everyone can play any position is actually a good thing rather than always specialised players. I like the idea that if you can control a ball well you should be useful all
over the pitch. You can teach positioning. But control, tackling, speed .. u need to have it.
in this league having someone who is a dedicated midfielder (JWP or Andy Irving) doesn’t solve your problems automatically if they are just shit players. Under no circumstances would you even dream of playing those 2 as RB or any other position. Which says a lot about the quality of AVB and any player we can identify that can play multiple positions competently.
Finally, I’m an idealist I suppose. And Cruyffs ideas of total football where everyone can play any position is actually a good thing rather than always specialised players. I like the idea that if you can control a ball well you should be useful all
over the pitch. You can teach positioning. But control, tackling, speed .. u need to have it.
- Tomshardware
- Posts: 992
- Old WHO Number: 266280
- Has liked: 366 times
- Been liked: 182 times
Re: Converting players…
Rossal wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 11:38 AWB in centre midfield.......basically Soucek with more slide tackles. His biggest limitations are his technical ability on the ball........which is like most of our other midfielders at the moment.
Turning Hermadsen into the next Eyal Berkovic is our best bet at the moment
I'm staggered that you're saying AWB is technically limited on the ball.
-
southbankbornnbred
- Posts: 1495
- Old WHO Number: 14766
- Has liked: 376 times
- Been liked: 567 times
Re: Converting players…
Under the right manager, and with a decent set of defenders around him, AWB is a top-class right back.
He was exposed against Chelsea - his worst game for us - simply because our defence is so porous that their midfield and attack were creating overloads at will. Too often, AWB was asked to keep track of two runners - and he go no help from a slow, immobile midfield.
He played badly that day, but I defy any right back to play well alongside those centre halves, and that central midfield, all season.
What I'm saying is: why change him to midfield? Play your best players in their best positions. If you do that all over the pitch, you'll have less need to panic and start experimenting with defenders in midfield and midfielders in attack.
We need to do the basics well first, before fannying around. That's the lesson of Monday night. Nuno was trying to be too clever too soon.
Friday night, one to eleven, play your best players in each position. Paqueta is Brazil's #8. Don't start him as a centre forward etc.
He was exposed against Chelsea - his worst game for us - simply because our defence is so porous that their midfield and attack were creating overloads at will. Too often, AWB was asked to keep track of two runners - and he go no help from a slow, immobile midfield.
He played badly that day, but I defy any right back to play well alongside those centre halves, and that central midfield, all season.
What I'm saying is: why change him to midfield? Play your best players in their best positions. If you do that all over the pitch, you'll have less need to panic and start experimenting with defenders in midfield and midfielders in attack.
We need to do the basics well first, before fannying around. That's the lesson of Monday night. Nuno was trying to be too clever too soon.
Friday night, one to eleven, play your best players in each position. Paqueta is Brazil's #8. Don't start him as a centre forward etc.
Re: Converting players…
One of the most successful position changes was Antonio of course. But I'd sooner buy what we need rather than converting players. I don't think we have the luxury to experiment right now, as seen on Monday.
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3926
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 782 times
Re: Converting players…
I can't stand this.
There's a reason why a player has played 99% of his life in that one position.
There's a reason why a player has played 99% of his life in that one position.
-
threesixty
- Posts: 960
- Old WHO Number: 14819
- Has liked: 133 times
- Been liked: 257 times
Re: Converting players…
Rossal wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 11:50threesixty wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 11:41Rossal wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 11:38 AWB in centre midfield.......basically Soucek with more slide tackles. His biggest limitations are his technical ability on the ball........which is like most of our other midfielders at the moment.
Turning Hermadsen into the next Eyal Berkovic is our best bet at the momentInteresting you think AWB is limited technically? I think he’s one of our best on the ball technically, light years ahead of Soucek and JWP etc.. And he’s not slow at all. Strange what some people see…The main part of him leaving United was him struggling in the final third with his quality of crosses. He also got moved back from RW to RB i guess for his limitations going forward. He doesnt strike me as a good ball striker or a great touch etc.
I see the thinking I just don't see any attributes to make AWB a central midfield player. If we were going to convert him anywhere it would be as a CB for me.
Wouldn’t be asking him to cross in a CM position. I’d just want him to get around the pitch more at speed and break up play and make a forward pass. The main reason for me is when I see him play he doesn’t get bullied off the ball and can really tackle. None of our midfielders do any of that. He’s sort of the nearest in ability to a Declan rice in terms of basic play. Rice also came from a defence background.
I did wonder about Todibo and kilman too but Todibo just looks unfit and kilman too slow.
I did wonder about Todibo and kilman too but Todibo just looks unfit and kilman too slow.
-
northbankboy68
- Posts: 315
- Old WHO Number: 17239
- Has liked: 75 times
- Been liked: 46 times
Re: Converting players…
An obvious one for me is Soucek as CB. He often helps out there in dead ball plays and has become static in midfield. He could still go up front for corners.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 3711
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 184 times
- Been liked: 1018 times
Re: Converting players…
Rossal wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 11:50threesixty wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 11:41Rossal wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 11:38 AWB in centre midfield.......basically Soucek with more slide tackles. His biggest limitations are his technical ability on the ball........which is like most of our other midfielders at the moment.
Turning Hermadsen into the next Eyal Berkovic is our best bet at the momentInteresting you think AWB is limited technically? I think he’s one of our best on the ball technically, light years ahead of Soucek and JWP etc.. And he’s not slow at all. Strange what some people see…The main part of him leaving United was him struggling in the final third with his quality of crosses. He also got moved back from RW to RB i guess for his limitations going forward. He doesnt strike me as a good ball striker or a great touch etc.
I see the thinking I just don't see any attributes to make AWB a central midfield player. If we were going to convert him anywhere it would be as a CB for me.
I'd be tempted to try him at CB, at the very least as the third one if we played a three. At 6 foot he's just about tall enough and he's faster than anyone we have there, BUT I think he'd get bullied by strikers and he'd need someone really physical beside him to make up for it. And sadly the other CBs we have are a bunch of fucking pansies.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 3711
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 184 times
- Been liked: 1018 times
Re: Converting players…
threesixty wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 11:41Rossal wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 11:38 AWB in centre midfield.......basically Soucek with more slide tackles. His biggest limitations are his technical ability on the ball........which is like most of our other midfielders at the moment.
Turning Hermadsen into the next Eyal Berkovic is our best bet at the momentInteresting you think AWB is limited technically? I think he’s one of our best on the ball technically, light years ahead of Soucek and JWP etc.. And he’s not slow at all. Strange what some people see…
The main part of him leaving United was him struggling in the final third with his quality of crosses. He also got moved back from RW to RB i guess for his limitations going forward. He doesnt strike me as a good ball striker or a great touch etc.
I see the thinking I just don't see any attributes to make AWB a central midfield player. If we were going to convert him anywhere it would be as a CB for me.
I see the thinking I just don't see any attributes to make AWB a central midfield player. If we were going to convert him anywhere it would be as a CB for me.
- El Scorchio
- Posts: 3711
- Old WHO Number: 227648
- Has liked: 184 times
- Been liked: 1018 times
Re: Converting players…
I think it's more based on the player's attributes than the manager's quality. It could be argued that a good manager wouldn't have to do that because he'd have what he needs in the right positions already (but of course that relies on good recruitment too which we do not have) It's not on Potter, Lop or Nuno that Paqueta or Bowen can't really play up front for example- they just can't do it. They aren't suited to it. It's a rare player who could probably play almost anywhere on the park and still even be effective- let alone good. Gerrard is a good example, he was just that good that he could have played outfield anywhere and been good. Most players are nowhere near that complete.
Joelinton is interesting. he was being called a flop at first, but I think his success at a different position is more an exception to the rule and a happy accident than something that's easy to do- otherwise it would happen all the time. Mostly when we've tried it, it might work for a game or two but the player sooner or later is exposed as not a natural in that position and you're back to square one. It might be worth trying AWB there, just because we at least won't be massively downgraded at RB if we did. But then is he going to be a better midfielder than the players we have? Sure he will be quicker but it counts for nothing if he can't read the game well or spot passes as a midfielder rather than a right back. Todibo might be a candidate too, but while he has some qualities, i think he'd be far too unfit to do it.
To think of another example where it's worked well though, Phil Neville- also interestingly from full back to CM, but as I said, it's not a straightforward thing and there's a reason it's so rare. Of course Bonzo played Right back, Midfield and Centre Back for us as well.
Joelinton is interesting. he was being called a flop at first, but I think his success at a different position is more an exception to the rule and a happy accident than something that's easy to do- otherwise it would happen all the time. Mostly when we've tried it, it might work for a game or two but the player sooner or later is exposed as not a natural in that position and you're back to square one. It might be worth trying AWB there, just because we at least won't be massively downgraded at RB if we did. But then is he going to be a better midfielder than the players we have? Sure he will be quicker but it counts for nothing if he can't read the game well or spot passes as a midfielder rather than a right back. Todibo might be a candidate too, but while he has some qualities, i think he'd be far too unfit to do it.
To think of another example where it's worked well though, Phil Neville- also interestingly from full back to CM, but as I said, it's not a straightforward thing and there's a reason it's so rare. Of course Bonzo played Right back, Midfield and Centre Back for us as well.
-
threesixty
- Posts: 960
- Old WHO Number: 14819
- Has liked: 133 times
- Been liked: 257 times
Re: Converting players…
Rossal wrote: ↑22 Oct 2025, 11:38 AWB in centre midfield.......basically Soucek with more slide tackles. His biggest limitations are his technical ability on the ball........which is like most of our other midfielders at the moment.
Turning Hermadsen into the next Eyal Berkovic is our best bet at the moment
Interesting you think AWB is limited technically? I think he’s one of our best on the ball technically, light years ahead of Soucek and JWP etc.. And he’s not slow at all. Strange what some people see…
Re: Converting players…
AWB in centre midfield.......basically Soucek with more slide tackles. His biggest limitations are his technical ability on the ball........which is like most of our other midfielders at the moment.
Turning Hermadsen into the next Eyal Berkovic is our best bet at the moment
Turning Hermadsen into the next Eyal Berkovic is our best bet at the moment
