AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
No to Digital ID
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
riosleftsock
- Posts: 1783
- Old WHO Number: 14557
- Has liked: 359 times
- Been liked: 114 times
Re: No to Digital ID
THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 12:04XKhammer wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 12:01THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 11:56...and going on your register involves a criminal record.
I guess that makes you James Saville.ThickClit you are so dense that you don't even know what a DBS check is,you have to pay for it and its done by in my case the Metropolitan Police
You can mud sling and keep up the non stop nonce nonsense but youre looking awful stupid now...seek helpDisclosure and Barring service, costs about 20, practically everyone does them now as a liability issue. It doesn't make you or you job on the bins seem important.
Oh dear ThickClit you truly are making yourself look fucking a liar and thick as shit
My DBS is enhanced and costs £78.50,bit more than you're super duper 007 James Bent clearance that the Met Plod can't excess for a score lol
Keep this up as its hilarious...you need back up mate,maybe David Icke the sailor boy,the gutless Eyetie shitbag or the sad old creepy trannie raspberry Oxbore
My DBS is enhanced and costs £78.50,bit more than you're super duper 007 James Bent clearance that the Met Plod can't excess for a score lol
Keep this up as its hilarious...you need back up mate,maybe David Icke the sailor boy,the gutless Eyetie shitbag or the sad old creepy trannie raspberry Oxbore
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1153
- Been liked: 273 times
Re: No to Digital ID
XKhammer wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 12:01THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 11:56...and going on your register involves a criminal record.
I guess that makes you James Saville.ThickClit you are so dense that you don't even know what a DBS check is,you have to pay for it and its done by in my case the Metropolitan Police
You can mud sling and keep up the non stop nonce nonsense but youre looking awful stupid now...seek help
Disclosure and Barring service, costs about 20, practically everyone does them now as a liability issue. It doesn't make you or you job on the bins seem important.
Re: No to Digital ID
THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 11:56XKhammer wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 11:21THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 11:13And you'd be right, my security clearance is review is annual and the MET aren't important enough to do it.
Besides, a DBS check will just tell an employer what register you're on as long as they keep you away from kids they're golden.
Wrong moron a DBS check is about your criminal record and also if under criminal investigation
Ha ha so you're claiming you're security check is so high the Met plod cant check you out...ha ha who do you think you are James Bond ha ha more like James Bender...and going on your register involves a criminal record.
I guess that makes you James Saville.
ThickClit you are so dense that you don't even know what a DBS check is,you have to pay for it and its done by in my case the Metropolitan Police
You can mud sling and keep up the non stop nonce nonsense but youre looking awful stupid now...seek help
You can mud sling and keep up the non stop nonce nonsense but youre looking awful stupid now...seek help
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1153
- Been liked: 273 times
Re: No to Digital ID
XKhammer wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 11:21THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 11:13And you'd be right, my security clearance is review is annual and the MET aren't important enough to do it.
Besides, a DBS check will just tell an employer what register you're on as long as they keep you away from kids they're golden.
Wrong moron a DBS check is about your criminal record and also if under criminal investigation
Ha ha so you're claiming you're security check is so high the Met plod cant check you out...ha ha who do you think you are James Bond ha ha more like James Bender
...and going on your register involves a criminal record.
I guess that makes you James Saville.
I guess that makes you James Saville.
Re: No to Digital ID
THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 11:13XKhammer wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 11:05THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 05:37As you're already on a few "registers" you've no ID left to surrender.I'm DBS checked every 3 years moron by Met plod,bet you're notAnd you'd be right, my security clearance is review is annual and the MET aren't important enough to do it.
Besides, a DBS check will just tell an employer what register you're on as long as they keep you away from kids they're golden.
Wrong moron a DBS check is about your criminal record and also if under criminal investigation
Ha ha so you're claiming you're security check is so high the Met plod cant check you out...ha ha who do you think you are James Bond ha ha more like James Bender
Ha ha so you're claiming you're security check is so high the Met plod cant check you out...ha ha who do you think you are James Bond ha ha more like James Bender
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1153
- Been liked: 273 times
Re: No to Digital ID
XKhammer wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 11:05THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 05:37As you're already on a few "registers" you've no ID left to surrender.I'm DBS checked every 3 years moron by Met plod,bet you're not
And you'd be right, my security clearance is review is annual and the MET aren't important enough to do it.
Besides, a DBS check will just tell an employer what register you're on as long as they keep you away from kids they're golden.
Besides, a DBS check will just tell an employer what register you're on as long as they keep you away from kids they're golden.
Re: No to Digital ID
THUNDERCLINT wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 05:37XKhammer wrote: ↑05 Nov 2025, 05:25Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025, 23:47Looks like you're all 4 it, 2 me, but 1 can always see 0 in it.Im all for it if it stops benefits cheats like you,so l understand why you fear itAs you're already on a few "registers" you've no ID left to surrender.
I'm DBS checked every 3 years moron by Met plod,bet you're not
-
THUNDERCLINT
- Posts: 1153
- Been liked: 273 times
Re: No to Digital ID
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑04 Nov 2025, 23:47Looks like you're all 4 it, 2 me, but 1 can always see 0 in it.
Im all for it if it stops benefits cheats like you,so l understand why you fear it
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5029
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 45 times
- Been liked: 650 times
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3600
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 910 times
- Been liked: 1305 times
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5029
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 45 times
- Been liked: 650 times
Re: No to Digital ID
XKhammer wrote: ↑04 Oct 2025, 11:58Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑04 Oct 2025, 07:28XKhammer wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 23:30Sort of agree that some people banged up like the Tory bird was well OTT,but think the real extremists like jihadists ain't dealt with
Also agree the media like BBC with spend tons of tax payers dosh on a snide to go undercover for 7 months in Charing Cross nick to get a handful of thick plod pissed off duty swearing,but totally ignoring millions of Muslims calling for jihad and when you get what happens in Manchester its suddenly the make believe far right fault....couldn't make it up unless you're ThickClit or OxboreWhen people want some background on how governments and organisations, (plan to) use information it makes perfect sense to discuss the subject with people who have (had) a significant role working/studying such areas.
When people want to know the best way to push a broom around a factory floor, it makes perfect sense to ask joyo - real name Gary Savile-Harris.Bet you sweep the Trannies off their feet
You care to stop infesting every post you respond to with your favourite hobby?
We all get it - you're absolutely besotted with ladyboys. It couldn't be clearer.
We all get it - you're absolutely besotted with ladyboys. It couldn't be clearer.
Re: No to Digital ID
Mike Oxsaw" wrote: ↑04 Oct 2025, 07:28XKhammer wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 23:30only1billybonds wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 22:05 =12.35px"We ain't China ffs!
=12.35pxDon't understand the paranoia about this"
Try telling that to those who are/were banged up for posting hurty words on the internet.
Sort of agree that some people banged up like the Tory bird was well OTT,but think the real extremists like jihadists ain't dealt with
Also agree the media like BBC with spend tons of tax payers dosh on a snide to go undercover for 7 months in Charing Cross nick to get a handful of thick plod pissed off duty swearing,but totally ignoring millions of Muslims calling for jihad and when you get what happens in Manchester its suddenly the make believe far right fault....couldn't make it up unless you're ThickClit or OxboreWhen people want some background on how governments and organisations, (plan to) use information it makes perfect sense to discuss the subject with people who have (had) a significant role working/studying such areas.
When people want to know the best way to push a broom around a factory floor, it makes perfect sense to ask joyo - real name Gary Savile-Harris.
Bet you sweep the Trannies off their feet
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5029
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 45 times
- Been liked: 650 times
Re: No to Digital ID
XKhammer wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 23:30only1billybonds wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 22:05 =12.35px"We ain't China ffs!
=12.35pxDon't understand the paranoia about this"
Try telling that to those who are/were banged up for posting hurty words on the internet.
Sort of agree that some people banged up like the Tory bird was well OTT,but think the real extremists like jihadists ain't dealt with
Also agree the media like BBC with spend tons of tax payers dosh on a snide to go undercover for 7 months in Charing Cross nick to get a handful of thick plod pissed off duty swearing,but totally ignoring millions of Muslims calling for jihad and when you get what happens in Manchester its suddenly the make believe far right fault....couldn't make it up unless you're ThickClit or Oxbore
When people want some background on how governments and organisations, (plan to) use information it makes perfect sense to discuss the subject with people who have (had) a significant role working/studying such areas.
When people want to know the best way to push a broom around a factory floor, it makes perfect sense to ask joyo - real name Gary Savile-Harris.
When people want to know the best way to push a broom around a factory floor, it makes perfect sense to ask joyo - real name Gary Savile-Harris.
Re: No to Digital ID
only1billybonds wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 22:05 =12.35px"We ain't China ffs!
=12.35pxDon't understand the paranoia about this"
Try telling that to those who are/were banged up for posting hurty words on the internet.
Sort of agree that some people banged up like the Tory bird was well OTT,but think the real extremists like jihadists ain't dealt with
Also agree the media like BBC with spend tons of tax payers dosh on a snide to go undercover for 7 months in Charing Cross nick to get a handful of thick plod pissed off duty swearing,but totally ignoring millions of Muslims calling for jihad and when you get what happens in Manchester its suddenly the make believe far right fault....couldn't make it up unless you're ThickClit or Oxbore
Also agree the media like BBC with spend tons of tax payers dosh on a snide to go undercover for 7 months in Charing Cross nick to get a handful of thick plod pissed off duty swearing,but totally ignoring millions of Muslims calling for jihad and when you get what happens in Manchester its suddenly the make believe far right fault....couldn't make it up unless you're ThickClit or Oxbore
Re: No to Digital ID
Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 21:59 There's also 1.2billion people there, compared to 70mil here.
Considering the UK tops the charts for that sort of arrest by absolutely mental numbers, you could just use any other country you fancy, where you won't be able to use that argument.
Anyway, going by the rate we are with all that shit, we very much are going the way of China. That was the point.
If we are going the way of China there won't be as many doing bird as you stated
Seriously don't get your point ..you think its better in China what you say online or we are stricter?
Been to China twice and its very restricted to what you can access online...couldn't access BBC...well that's a bonus point l suppose for the cufflinks
Seriously don't get your point ..you think its better in China what you say online or we are stricter?
Been to China twice and its very restricted to what you can access online...couldn't access BBC...well that's a bonus point l suppose for the cufflinks
Re: No to Digital ID
zebthecat wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 19:19Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 18:43How many people are in prison for saying words on the internet in China?
I'll give you a clue - it's a fuck ton less than here. And there's a fuck ton more people over there an all.I'm sure that will be a comfort for the million or so Uigurs in internment camps.
Lol ...fair point
-
only1billybonds
- Posts: 2386
- Old WHO Number: 217810
- Has liked: 570 times
- Been liked: 850 times
Re: No to Digital ID
=12.35px"We ain't China ffs!
=12.35pxDon't understand the paranoia about this"
Try telling that to those who are/were banged up for posting hurty words on the internet.
=12.35pxDon't understand the paranoia about this"
Try telling that to those who are/were banged up for posting hurty words on the internet.
-
Eerie Decent
- Posts: 1021
- Has liked: 161 times
- Been liked: 467 times
Re: No to Digital ID
There's also 1.2billion people there, compared to 70mil here.
Considering the UK tops the charts for that sort of arrest by absolutely mental numbers, you could just use any other country you fancy, where you won't be able to use that argument.
Anyway, going by the rate we are with all that shit, we very much are going the way of China. That was the point.
Considering the UK tops the charts for that sort of arrest by absolutely mental numbers, you could just use any other country you fancy, where you won't be able to use that argument.
Anyway, going by the rate we are with all that shit, we very much are going the way of China. That was the point.
Re: No to Digital ID
You have a point ED.
There is a reason why not many Chinese poeple are arrested for posting stuff on the internet as they know that their governnment area monitoring everything they do online as a matter of course. They are also limited to only Chinese government approved or owned sites.
There is a reason why not many Chinese poeple are arrested for posting stuff on the internet as they know that their governnment area monitoring everything they do online as a matter of course. They are also limited to only Chinese government approved or owned sites.
-
Eerie Decent
- Posts: 1021
- Has liked: 161 times
- Been liked: 467 times
Re: No to Digital ID
Eerie Decent" wrote: ↑03 Oct 2025, 18:43How many people are in prison for saying words on the internet in China?
I'll give you a clue - it's a fuck ton less than here. And there's a fuck ton more people over there an all.
I'm sure that will be a comfort for the million or so Uigurs in internment camps.
-
Eerie Decent
- Posts: 1021
- Has liked: 161 times
- Been liked: 467 times
Re: No to Digital ID
How many people are in prison for saying words on the internet in China?
I'll give you a clue - it's a fuck ton less than here. And there's a fuck ton more people over there an all.
I'll give you a clue - it's a fuck ton less than here. And there's a fuck ton more people over there an all.
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 3823
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 67 times
- Been liked: 521 times
Re: No to Digital ID
Don’t you know… Digital ID will be used to stop you buying meat & arrest you for not buying the new Taylor Swift album