Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Forum area for all things that are non-football.
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Post Reply
dm
Posts: 417
Has liked: 176 times
Been liked: 131 times

Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post dm »

I can think of of a few:-

Queen
David Bowie
Hawkwind
Rush
Adam and the Ants
UFO
Iron Maiden
Yes
Motorhead (On Parole)
Rainbow

you guys?     ‘Guess I’ll just sit back and wait for the “most pointless thread ever” type remarks’. 
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 959
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 579 times
Been liked: 390 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

Bungo wrote: 30 Nov 2025, 11:08
Tell me, do you enjoy this 100% sober or does being in some other state help? I know when I've seen them live, many around me seem to be slightly 'elsewhere'?😁
 
 
 
In all honesty fella, was heavily into grass back in the day, certainly when I first heard the album.
Not so much nowadays, although the missus has never liked me playing Pushit as she says my personality changes🤔 She says the look on my face, I'm about to kill someone!
Funny as I'm more likeley to want to kill someone when she sticks that cսnt Sheeran on 🤣🤣
User avatar
Bungo
Posts: 649
Old WHO Number: 228443
Has liked: 210 times
Been liked: 152 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post Bungo »

MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: 30 Nov 2025, 09:18
Interesting. This is one of those earlier songs that I just don't connect with at all.

Tell me, do you enjoy this 100% sober or does being in some other state help? I know when I've seen them live, many around me seem to be slightly 'elsewhere'?😁
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 959
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 579 times
Been liked: 390 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

Bungo wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 08:02
Tool are one of the very few bands I like, where I like each release more than what has come before. 
 
 
To be honest mate, ALL their albums are fucking excellent, although if I had to choose a favourite it'd probably be Ænima, but this is more down to the fact it includes the astounding 'Pushit', without doubt in my top 3 favourite tracks by anyone. Luckily they performed it at the 02 back in May '22.
violator
Posts: 772
Old WHO Number: 15360
Has liked: 251 times
Been liked: 229 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post violator »

Swiss. wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 15:54
violator wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 14:59
Swiss. wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 14:21
More than Just Can't Get Enough? 
JCGE - 8
See You - 6
"'he wrote See You years before its release'' I think he's lying. Remember everyone thought they were finished when Clarke left. 
Ok yeah he's lying 🙄
Nutsin
Posts: 2916
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 180 times
Been liked: 330 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post Nutsin »

Nutsin wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 15:57 UB40 signing off.

great album! 
Swiss.
Posts: 1896
Old WHO Number: 220150
Has liked: 289 times
Been liked: 349 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post Swiss. »

Not sure if there was an album between Surfin Safari and Pet Sounds by the Beach Boys but they are very different with Pet Sounds incorporating Spectre's Wall of Sound. 
Nutsin
Posts: 2916
Old WHO Number: 274983
Has liked: 180 times
Been liked: 330 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post Nutsin »

UB40 signing off.

great album! 
Swiss.
Posts: 1896
Old WHO Number: 220150
Has liked: 289 times
Been liked: 349 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post Swiss. »

violator wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 14:59
Swiss. wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 14:21
violator wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 12:09
He already had been before that, he wrote See You years before its release and it charted higher than any Vince song
More than Just Can't Get Enough? 
JCGE - 8
See You - 6
"'he wrote See You years before its release'' I think he's lying. Remember everyone thought they were finished when Clarke left. 
violator
Posts: 772
Old WHO Number: 15360
Has liked: 251 times
Been liked: 229 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post violator »

Swiss. wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 14:21
violator wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 12:09
Swiss. wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 11:58
I was thinking more Martin Gore started to song write. 
He already had been before that, he wrote See You years before its release and it charted higher than any Vince song
More than Just Can't Get Enough? 
JCGE - 8
See You - 6
Swiss.
Posts: 1896
Old WHO Number: 220150
Has liked: 289 times
Been liked: 349 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post Swiss. »

violator wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 12:09
Swiss. wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 11:58
violator wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 11:14
Agreed, it meant Alan Wilder was brought into the mix.
I was thinking more Martin Gore started to song write. 
He already had been before that, he wrote See You years before its release and it charted higher than any Vince song
More than Just Can't Get Enough? 
Swiss.
Posts: 1896
Old WHO Number: 220150
Has liked: 289 times
Been liked: 349 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post Swiss. »

Agree with Nirvana comments. Bleach was very much a heavy rock album opposed to the grunge sound of Nevermind. 
violator
Posts: 772
Old WHO Number: 15360
Has liked: 251 times
Been liked: 229 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post violator »

Swiss. wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 11:58
violator wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 11:14
Swiss. wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 10:46
Vince Clarke leaving was probably best thing that happened for Depeche Mode. 
Agreed, it meant Alan Wilder was brought into the mix.
I was thinking more Martin Gore started to song write. 
He already had been before that, he wrote See You years before its release and it charted higher than any Vince song
Swiss.
Posts: 1896
Old WHO Number: 220150
Has liked: 289 times
Been liked: 349 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post Swiss. »

violator wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 11:14
Swiss. wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 10:46
zebthecat wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 18:51
I saw Simple Minds round about the time Real to Real Cacophony came out and they were dark and interesting then with pounding synths and bass with Jim Kerr howling over the top. That changed pretty quickly.

Depeche Mode went in the opposite direction when Vince Clarke left.
Vince Clarke leaving was probably best thing that happened for Depeche Mode. 
Agreed, it meant Alan Wilder was brought into the mix.
I was thinking more Martin Gore started to song write. 
Swiss.
Posts: 1896
Old WHO Number: 220150
Has liked: 289 times
Been liked: 349 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post Swiss. »

The Cult. Started off as an Indie band and ended up full heavy metal. 
violator
Posts: 772
Old WHO Number: 15360
Has liked: 251 times
Been liked: 229 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post violator »

Swiss. wrote: 27 Nov 2025, 10:46
zebthecat wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 18:51
honky cat" wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 18:16
More recent, human league and simple minds.


 
I saw Simple Minds round about the time Real to Real Cacophony came out and they were dark and interesting then with pounding synths and bass with Jim Kerr howling over the top. That changed pretty quickly.

Depeche Mode went in the opposite direction when Vince Clarke left.
Vince Clarke leaving was probably best thing that happened for Depeche Mode. 
Agreed, it meant Alan Wilder was brought into the mix.
Mr Anon
Posts: 733
Old WHO Number: 254103
Has liked: 149 times
Been liked: 183 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post Mr Anon »

Lee Trundle" wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 12:20
zebthecat wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 12:07
Lee Trundle" wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 11:51 Huey Lewis and The News.  Their early work was a little too new wave for my tastes, but when Sports came out in '83, I think they really came into their own, commercially and artistically. The whole album has a clear, crisp sound, and a new sheen of consummate professionalism that really gives the songs a big boost. He's been compared to Elvis Costello, but I think Huey has a far more bitter, cynical sense of humor.
Do you like Phil Collins? 
I've been a big Genesis fan ever since the release of their 1980 album, Duke. Before that, I really didn't understand any of their work. Too artsy, too intellectual. It was on Duke where Phil Collins' presence became more apparent. I think Invisible Touch was the group's undisputed masterpiece. It's an epic meditation on intangibility. At the same time, it deepens and enriches the meaning of the preceding three albums.

(glad someone got it!)
Christy, get down on your knees so Sabrina can see your arsehole
Swiss.
Posts: 1896
Old WHO Number: 220150
Has liked: 289 times
Been liked: 349 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post Swiss. »

zebthecat wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 18:51
honky cat" wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 18:16
More recent, human league and simple minds.

 
I saw Simple Minds round about the time Real to Real Cacophony came out and they were dark and interesting then with pounding synths and bass with Jim Kerr howling over the top. That changed pretty quickly.

Depeche Mode went in the opposite direction when Vince Clarke left.
Vince Clarke leaving was probably best thing that happened for Depeche Mode. 
User avatar
Bungo
Posts: 649
Old WHO Number: 228443
Has liked: 210 times
Been liked: 152 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post Bungo »

MaryMillingtonsGhost wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 20:31

Also TOOL.
Their first 'album' (or is it an EP?) Opiate is a world away from Undertow in my opinion.
Tool are one of the very few bands I like, where I like each release more than what has come before. Fear Inoculum is without question my favourite Tool album with 10,000 days second.

I can only hope that they manage to release at least one more before I die...🤷‍♂️
 
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1895
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 371 times
Been liked: 236 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post zebthecat »

Spot on with Radiohead MMG.
The change was just a hint of where they'd go.
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 959
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 579 times
Been liked: 390 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

dm wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 14:43 Completely forgot about Porcupine Tree. Their first album On the Sunday of Life was quite different to what came after.  Damn good album though. 
 
 
Yes mate, chalk and cheese. Although don't really like (perhaps appreciate) it in all honesty.
Far prefer the later stuff.

Also TOOL.
Their first 'album' (or is it an EP?) Opiate is a world away from Undertow in my opinion.

I'd also add The Jam.
In The City has a far greater 'punk' sensibility than This Is The Modern World, in my humble.

Radiohead, Pablo Honey compared to The Bends?
On The Ball
Posts: 449
Old WHO Number: 14382
Has liked: 178 times
Been liked: 48 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post On The Ball »

A dull one, but Coldplay. Parachutes is completely different (and good).
only1billybonds
Posts: 2385
Old WHO Number: 217810
Has liked: 570 times
Been liked: 849 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post only1billybonds »

Very obvious example is Dylan. 

As for Genesis, i much prefer their less sucsessful period prior to the band becoming a trio. As for Collins, his first two solo albums were superb.

Springsteens first album was an absolute word salad, his writing became far less complicated as time went on.
User avatar
zebthecat
Posts: 1895
Old WHO Number: 16911
Has liked: 371 times
Been liked: 236 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post zebthecat »

honky cat" wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 18:16
More recent, human league and simple minds.
 
I saw Simple Minds round about the time Real to Real Cacophony came out and they were dark and interesting then with pounding synths and bass with Jim Kerr howling over the top. That changed pretty quickly.

Depeche Mode went in the opposite direction when Vince Clarke left.
RBshorty
Posts: 1043
Old WHO Number: 211268
Has liked: 102 times
Been liked: 139 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post RBshorty »

honky cat" wrote: 26 Nov 2025, 18:16 The beatles.

a lot of bands change, line up (e.g. Fleetwood mac) or they become more accomplished musicians and songwriters. 

the beatles were the same 4 men, and nothing of the first album existed by the time they got to Revolver. 

More recent, human league and simple minds.
Like many things in "Modern Music." The Fab Four set the bar. Boy Band - Rock Band. For better or worse.? The landscape had forever changed.
honky cat
Posts: 1246
Has liked: 713 times
Been liked: 476 times

Re: Bands whose first album was quite different from subsequent material

Post honky cat »

The beatles.

a lot of bands change, line up (e.g. Fleetwood mac) or they become more accomplished musicians and songwriters. 

the beatles were the same 4 men, and nothing of the first album existed by the time they got to Revolver. 

More recent, human league and simple minds.
Post Reply