AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
Ugs. Yes or no?
-
Hello Mrs. Jones
- Posts: 355
- Old WHO Number: 224273
- Has liked: 25 times
- Been liked: 58 times
- Nurse Ratched
- Posts: 1146
- Old WHO Number: 18642
- Has liked: 632 times
- Been liked: 587 times
Re: Ugs. Yes or no?
"I've seen them, but the shape and materials mean it's a big NOPE from me. I would panic if I had to wear those. Far too warm with all that sheepskin up to calf level. If my feet are not comfortable for any reason, I can't function."
- MaryMillingtonsGhost
- Posts: 959
- Old WHO Number: 300173
- Has liked: 579 times
- Been liked: 391 times
-
CanningTownWA
- Posts: 118
- Old WHO Number: 245976
- Has liked: 3 times
- Been liked: 4 times
Re: Ugs. Yes or no?
They are a generic term for sheepskin boots that were made by lots of small companies-people all over Australia and were cheap as chips then the name was registered by an American group and stated to sue all the Aussie companies that had been making them for donkeys years. They then started charging a fortune for inferior products made in China and made a global brand. Capitalism at its worst.
-
chim chim cha boo
- Posts: 458
- Old WHO Number: 17737
- Has liked: 28 times
- Been liked: 42 times
-
chim chim cha boo
- Posts: 458
- Old WHO Number: 17737
- Has liked: 28 times
- Been liked: 42 times
Re: Ugs. Yes or no?
No. I don't think it's in any way controversial to say that anyone caught wearing them should have their feet removed with a chainsaw and sent to Rwanda.
-
Russ of the BML
- Posts: 1244
- Old WHO Number: 14551
- Has liked: 459 times
- Been liked: 465 times
Re: Ugs. Yes or no?
"They tend to have a reputation for being worn by Essex slags. But, then again, what's wrong with that?"
-
Side of Ham
- Posts: 1481
- Old WHO Number: 215633
-
yngwies Cat
- Posts: 473
- Old WHO Number: 17468
- Has liked: 134 times
- Been liked: 110 times
Re: Ugs. Yes or no?
I once tried some on at an after party. They were incredibly comfortable. For that reason I am IN