Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

VAR - What is it good for?

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
Any Old Iron
Posts: 580
Old WHO Number: 10365
Has liked: 248 times
Been liked: 94 times

VAR - What is it good for?

Post Any Old Iron »

"Absolutely nothing. Say it again, yeah."
Helmut Shown
Posts: 1308
Old WHO Number: 213307
Has liked: 63 times
Been liked: 67 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Helmut Shown »

It's another tool for the FA to control who represents England in Europe and keep the status quo of the rich teams at the top. The fact that most of the referees come from the north west and those that don't originate north of Birmingham tells it all. 
Alfs
Posts: 953
Old WHO Number: 12872
Has liked: 75 times
Been liked: 170 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Alfs »

Simple way to fix it is to take an example from Cricket.  Each team has 3 VAR appeals, and if an appeal isn't called then the on field decision remains.
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 1367
Has liked: 340 times
Been liked: 553 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Far Cough UKunt »

Nothing wrong with the concept, it's the clowns operating it, is the problem, just take a look at Rugby's version of TMO, works like a fucking dream.

Oh and they mic up the refs as well to explain to the crowd.
John Drake
Posts: 116
Has liked: 4 times
Been liked: 64 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post John Drake »

As a reality check, Wolves put forward a proposal to scrap VAR just over a year ago and all the other 19 clubs voted against i.e. to continue with VAR.

Is the suggestion that the TV companies put pressure on the clubs to vote that way?

God knows why they see VAR as a positive for the game though.
Any Old Iron
Posts: 580
Old WHO Number: 10365
Has liked: 248 times
Been liked: 94 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Any Old Iron »

I think that most of the dimwits who were desperate for VAR to be brought in (Lineker for example) now accept it was a huge mistake. 
The trouble is that the head honchos of TV sport seem to love it.  And when it comes to football what TV wants, TV gets.  
As we all now know they don’t give a fuck about the match day fans. 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4496
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 518 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Mike Oxsaw »

Mex Martillo" wrote: 06 Sep 2025, 22:17 Unfortunately we are stuck with it.
I preferred the game without VAR.
The loss of a good celebration is really fucked and takes incredible amounts of joy from watching the game. The  injustice of a VAR error is massive compared to an on field ref making an error. VAR correcting an on field ref error is not enough compensation for these negatives.
When will the governing cunts realise?

 
...but it makes for "good" TV, and the media are the governing cunts.
User avatar
Mex Martillo
Posts: 1610
Location: Catalonia
Old WHO Number: 11796
Has liked: 193 times
Been liked: 208 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Mex Martillo »

Unfortunately we are stuck with it.
I preferred the game without VAR.
The loss of a good celebration is really fucked and takes incredible amounts of joy from watching the game. The  injustice of a VAR error is massive compared to an on field ref making an error. VAR correcting an on field ref error is not enough compensation for these negatives.
When will the governing cunts realise?
 
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3329
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 406 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Fauxstralian »

have been less than 3 times where a ref has rejected the VAR call
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3329
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 406 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Fauxstralian »

Have said before if VAR was to continue …. I’d rather it didn’t … then this idea of the ref panel covering it has to go
You see refs often in pairs where a ref may swap the following week with his VAR pal & be judging each other the other way round
Refs will go with VAR so that next week his mate won’t barbecue him by rejecting his call
By my reckoning there ha
User avatar
Mex Martillo
Posts: 1610
Location: Catalonia
Old WHO Number: 11796
Has liked: 193 times
Been liked: 208 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Mex Martillo »

Last night an on field ref. actually said no to VAR!
Denmark v Scotland. Last Scottish defender (Johnson) being challenged by a Dane went to head the ball but clearly controlled the ball with his upper arm. Ref. gave him a yellow and VAR said possible red and for ref. to have another look on the pitch side monitor. Ref. had a look and said no I was right it was a yellow.
Excellent progress. 
Could this happen in the Premier?
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3559
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 630 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Lee Trundle »

Sven You're nuts if you seen what you have done with VAR and still think there's a possibility that it may work.
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3329
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 406 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Fauxstralian »

None of those Try harder Ex players know the tricks & have no relationship with the refs on the pitch
Helmut Shown
Posts: 1308
Old WHO Number: 213307
Has liked: 63 times
Been liked: 67 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Helmut Shown »

"Ex players? Like Jamie O'Hara, Garth Crooks, Darren Bent, Gabby Agbonlohar, Danny (not a penalty for me) Murphy, Glenn Murray, Jamie Carragher, Clinton Morrison, Gary Neville?"
User avatar
Iron Duke
Posts: 1094
Old WHO Number: 251573
Has liked: 114 times
Been liked: 318 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Iron Duke »

"The diving twat Anthony Gordon was complaining about VAR not awarding him a penalty v Man Utd. I can see his point. Against West Ham, he only needs to stick his leg in front of someone and if contact is made it's a penalty. Against Man Utd, a player can make contact with his ankle and nothing is done. All VAR does is give another chance to favour the big six."
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3329
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 406 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Fauxstralian »

Well I think you would have some sort of vetting Would be plenty of ex League 1 or 2 players who know the game & could do with a job post playing Obviously former players of Premier league teams wouldn’t be involved with their own clubs The problem now is refs scratch each others backs as they don’t want to be thrown under the bus the next week Famously Mike Dean didn’t review something as his ‘mate’ was having a bad day
User avatar
Lee Trundle
Posts: 3559
Old WHO Number: 33318
Been liked: 630 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Lee Trundle »

"I keep seeing ex players should be involved. What's stopping them from being idiots? GABBY Agbonlahor has suggesting this before I switched the channel over this morning. He's as thick as pig shit. I see very little difference between what we have now, and what is being suggested with ex pros. I'd hate to have him reffing our games. People just need to admit to themselves that VAR is shit and will never work when there's human involvement."
Fauxstralian
Posts: 3329
Old WHO Number: 321173
Has liked: 56 times
Been liked: 406 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Fauxstralian »

"Hopefully not the Spanish clown who did the home game v Leverkusen I’m sure Premier league refs are the highest paid in the world so they should open it to overseas refs Can imagine any outsider that came in wouldn’t be welcomed by the current Cartel of Cunts If VAR is to be retained it should be operated by a different group from the current refs …. retired refs, ex players etc"
CanningTownWA
Posts: 118
Old WHO Number: 245976
Has liked: 3 times
Been liked: 4 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post CanningTownWA »

Get the top European refs in and dump our lot. No bias to certain clubs then. Hardly any issues with VAR in the Champions League.
JayeMPee
Posts: 88
Old WHO Number: 13127

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post JayeMPee »

"A clear and obvious mistake which in all probability the ref himself has realised he made. Allow 20 seconds maximum, after all the ref makes his judgement on the spot it shouldn't take a room full of 'experts' and a machine longer than that."
Helmut Shown
Posts: 1308
Old WHO Number: 213307
Has liked: 63 times
Been liked: 67 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Helmut Shown »

"The problem isn't the machine its the cunts in front of it, they must be acting under the instructions of the FA to keep their favoured darlings in the very profitable European places to prevent them setting up their own European super league. They already have it, free entry into the champions league courtesy of questionable refereeing."
GBHammer63
Posts: 304
Old WHO Number: 220787
Has liked: 71 times
Been liked: 65 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post GBHammer63 »

"VAR is shit how it is being used at the moment, should forget all the stupid line drawing for a bootlace offside stuff and just use a screenshot that’s immediately shown to the fans for anything clear and obvious. The problem getting rid of it altogether is everyone will then be totally reliant on the incompetent and biased refs and Lino’s so it should be used to drive up the standard of officiating as well as anything clear and obvious."
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 4496
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 29 times
Been liked: 518 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Mike Oxsaw »

"The media will absolutely hate this idea and will roll out it's influencers in style to prove (PROVE), backed up by ""indisputable"" data, that VAR enhances viewer experience of the game (and, coincidentally advertiser & sponsor reach), conveniently overlooking the impact it has on those actually at and participating in the game itself."
User avatar
Mex Martillo
Posts: 1610
Location: Catalonia
Old WHO Number: 11796
Has liked: 193 times
Been liked: 208 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Mex Martillo »

Premier League clubs to vote on scrapping VAR on June 6 Any rule changes need a two-thirds majority - 14 of of the 20 clubs - to vote in favour. Hope they do it. https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/articles/c4n1ndlknk1o
Side of Ham
Posts: 1481
Old WHO Number: 215633

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Side of Ham »

I don’t see the ending of VAR as getting the game back….they will just revert back to the previous bias the top clubs get.
Any Old Iron
Posts: 580
Old WHO Number: 10365
Has liked: 248 times
Been liked: 94 times

Re: VAR - What is it good for?

Post Any Old Iron »

"I have absolutely no interest or idea as to whether or not automated offside decisions will be an improvement on the current line drawing codswallop. Until VAR is dumped and we get our game back we, as the fans and supporters, will continue to endure a version of the game which is alien to our sporting heritage. The powers that be are truly clueless."
Post Reply