AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Forum rules
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
Whilst 'off-topic' means all non-football topics can be discussed. This is not a free for all. Rights to this area of the forum aren't implicit, and illegal, defamator, spammy or absuive topics will be removed, with the protagonist's sanctioned.
-
Come On You Irons
- Posts: 1011
- Old WHO Number: 304394
- Has liked: 55 times
- Been liked: 198 times
The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
There. Resident WHO political commentators and gurus can knock yourselves out in here and conduct your endless bickering. All other threads will be locked.
-
F 129 Row66
- Posts: 558
- Has liked: 279 times
- Been liked: 305 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
If 100s of thousands of people are demonstrating, why are the far left fascist groups like Antifa allowed to have a counter demonstration. they should be politely told to fuck off and then turn water canons and batons on them. They only ever want violent confrontation, are only ever there for a good time, provide no useful service to society, and as far as being anti-racist they are anti semitic hypocrites. They represent nobody.
- BRANDED
- Posts: 1956
- Location: London
- Old WHO Number: 209826
- Has liked: 102 times
- Been liked: 227 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Unheard gets it more than most
There are two possible scenarios. The first is that these people are not serious, and that this is all the empty performance of callous children. There is much evidence for this hypothesis: the loudest calls for political violence, displayed on social media, come from those who would be more obviously the victims than the perpetrators of the outcome they demand: the physically weak, the mentally fragile, the beneficiaries of a stable society they proclaim the wish to overturn. Just as with the deification of Luigi Mangione, the assassin whose most prominent journalistic groupie is a woman of indeterminate age frightened to go outside without a Covid mask, I have seen calls for political violence coming from a paraplegic woman unlikely herself to be manning checkpoints late at night or digging graves for her vanquished enemies. The bloodcurdling rhetoric of these silly and unworldly people, demanding further assassinations on Bluesky as if ordering food from a delivery app, is discordantly removed from the reality of the political violence that would surely cull them first. The spectacle is so absurd that it seems almost demeaning to take it seriously.
https://unherd.com/2025/09/americas-blo ... fantasies/
There are two possible scenarios. The first is that these people are not serious, and that this is all the empty performance of callous children. There is much evidence for this hypothesis: the loudest calls for political violence, displayed on social media, come from those who would be more obviously the victims than the perpetrators of the outcome they demand: the physically weak, the mentally fragile, the beneficiaries of a stable society they proclaim the wish to overturn. Just as with the deification of Luigi Mangione, the assassin whose most prominent journalistic groupie is a woman of indeterminate age frightened to go outside without a Covid mask, I have seen calls for political violence coming from a paraplegic woman unlikely herself to be manning checkpoints late at night or digging graves for her vanquished enemies. The bloodcurdling rhetoric of these silly and unworldly people, demanding further assassinations on Bluesky as if ordering food from a delivery app, is discordantly removed from the reality of the political violence that would surely cull them first. The spectacle is so absurd that it seems almost demeaning to take it seriously.
https://unherd.com/2025/09/americas-blo ... fantasies/
-
Jaan Kenbrovin
- Posts: 1208
- Old WHO Number: 269499
- Has liked: 67 times
- Been liked: 296 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025, 15:40 Personally don’t think the right should be :
racist
homophobic
misogynist
fascist
supporters of Nazi ideals
Mr Kirk appeared to tick off a few of those
Doesn’t mean he should be killed though
It does appear his murder was because he didn’t tick off ALL of those to the satisfaction of the Mormon gun lover from a family of Trump supporters
He was none of those things. Again you are parroting a desperate left wing narrative as fact, which makes zero sense.
Trying to attribute blame on Nick Fuentes and his followers is just another perfect example of the dangerous rhetoric that is out of control on the left. It doesn’t take two seconds to see which group are celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death and Nick Fuentes isn’t a part of it.
Trying to attribute blame on Nick Fuentes and his followers is just another perfect example of the dangerous rhetoric that is out of control on the left. It doesn’t take two seconds to see which group are celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death and Nick Fuentes isn’t a part of it.
- BRANDED
- Posts: 1956
- Location: London
- Old WHO Number: 209826
- Has liked: 102 times
- Been liked: 227 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
These concepts are the luxury of north London accountants not ordinary people.
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 3823
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 67 times
- Been liked: 521 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Personally don’t think the right should be :
racist
homophobic
misogynist
fascist
supporters of Nazi ideals
Mr Kirk appeared to tick off a few of those
Doesn’t mean he should be killed though
It does appear his murder was because he didn’t tick off ALL of those to the satisfaction of the Mormon gun lover from a family of Trump supporters
racist
homophobic
misogynist
fascist
supporters of Nazi ideals
Mr Kirk appeared to tick off a few of those
Doesn’t mean he should be killed though
It does appear his murder was because he didn’t tick off ALL of those to the satisfaction of the Mormon gun lover from a family of Trump supporters
- BRANDED
- Posts: 1956
- Location: London
- Old WHO Number: 209826
- Has liked: 102 times
- Been liked: 227 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Mad Dog" wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025, 14:46 Come to a conclusion over the last couple of days about the difference between thr right and left. The right think the lefties are deluded crazed idiots. The left think the right are evil scum who are vile and shouldnt be allowed to have a difference of opinion. Quick to label others as nazis and cancel their livelihoods. The amount of vitriol from them screaming at people and having histrionics is shocking.
And social media just feeds both growing fat off the conflict therefore clicks and profits.
Social media has a lot to answer for. The echo chambers and radicalisation at both ends are severely dangerous. Neither side willing to listen to the other. So many stories of people refusing to engage with family over a difference of politics.
For all the continuous repetititive bickering and arguing and pathetic name calling on here and despite nobody even conceding points a little, people are at least engaging in a difference of opinion on here
Diversity is obviously not a strength
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5029
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 45 times
- Been liked: 650 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
So, then. 110,000 would rather have our women & children's safety placed in national importance above 5,000 who would rather hand (other people's) money out to those who don't deserve it, let alone have earned it.
A tad more comprehensive that the Brexit result, but guaranteed which side will get all the positive media coverage and which side will be portrayed as selfish, evil bastards.
A tad more comprehensive that the Brexit result, but guaranteed which side will get all the positive media coverage and which side will be portrayed as selfish, evil bastards.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Come to a conclusion over the last couple of days about the difference between thr right and left. The right think the lefties are deluded crazed idiots. The left think the right are evil scum who are vile and shouldnt be allowed to have a difference of opinion. Quick to label others as nazis and cancel their livelihoods. The amount of vitriol from them screaming at people and having histrionics is shocking.
And social media just feeds both growing fat off the conflict therefore clicks and profits.
Social media has a lot to answer for. The echo chambers and radicalisation at both ends are severely dangerous. Neither side willing to listen to the other. So many stories of people refusing to engage with family over a difference of politics.
For all the continuous repetititive bickering and arguing and pathetic name calling on here and despite nobody even conceding points a little, people are at least engaging in a difference of opinion on here
And social media just feeds both growing fat off the conflict therefore clicks and profits.
Social media has a lot to answer for. The echo chambers and radicalisation at both ends are severely dangerous. Neither side willing to listen to the other. So many stories of people refusing to engage with family over a difference of politics.
For all the continuous repetititive bickering and arguing and pathetic name calling on here and despite nobody even conceding points a little, people are at least engaging in a difference of opinion on here
-
Jaan Kenbrovin
- Posts: 1208
- Old WHO Number: 269499
- Has liked: 67 times
- Been liked: 296 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025, 13:29 Keep up
Tyler Robinson killed Kirk because he wasn’t right wing enough
I see the effects of division and where it will lead
Unfortunately the President of the United States doesn’t care about driving unity in the nation
That is an extremely dangerous position
It’s incredible that you would double down having criticised the speculation on right, by parroting the desperate narrative of people on the left.
It’s also amazing you double down on Trump. When the left rioted for months over a dead junkie criminal, yet there will be absolutely no equivalent of this from the right.
It’s also amazing you double down on Trump. When the left rioted for months over a dead junkie criminal, yet there will be absolutely no equivalent of this from the right.
- BRANDED
- Posts: 1956
- Location: London
- Old WHO Number: 209826
- Has liked: 102 times
- Been liked: 227 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025, 13:29 Keep up
Tyler Robinson killed Kirk because he wasn’t right wing enough
I see the effects of division and where it will lead
Unfortunately the President of the United States doesn’t care about driving unity in the nation
That is an extremely dangerous position
How would you know this?
I mean its a possibility but even in the World of stupidity this would be stupid beyond even your imagination.
I mean its a possibility but even in the World of stupidity this would be stupid beyond even your imagination.
- Takashi Miike
- Posts: 3600
- Old WHO Number: 233644
- Has liked: 910 times
- Been liked: 1305 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
he sees 'the effects of division' on the mean streets of Hampstead. stupid fucking fake Aussie minge
- Mike Oxsaw
- Posts: 5029
- Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
- Old WHO Number: 14021
- Has liked: 45 times
- Been liked: 650 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025, 13:29 Keep up
Tyler Robinson killed Kirk because he wasn’t right wing enough
I see the effects of division and where it will lead
Unfortunately the President of the United States doesn’t care about driving unity in the nation
That is an extremely dangerous position
Perhaps Trump has decided that the most effective way to "clean the swamp" is a civil war where the extremists cut each others' numbers down to a more manageable size.
Neither a pleasant or, in my opinion, a civilised stance, but he clearly knows more about his country than do you or I.
Neither a pleasant or, in my opinion, a civilised stance, but he clearly knows more about his country than do you or I.
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 3823
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 67 times
- Been liked: 521 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Keep up
Tyler Robinson killed Kirk because he wasn’t right wing enough
I see the effects of division and where it will lead
Unfortunately the President of the United States doesn’t care about driving unity in the nation
That is an extremely dangerous position
Tyler Robinson killed Kirk because he wasn’t right wing enough
I see the effects of division and where it will lead
Unfortunately the President of the United States doesn’t care about driving unity in the nation
That is an extremely dangerous position
-
Jaan Kenbrovin
- Posts: 1208
- Old WHO Number: 269499
- Has liked: 67 times
- Been liked: 296 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Fauxstralian wrote: ↑13 Sep 2025, 10:13
There are faults on both sides.
With problems on the right egged on by the Orange Fascist who is in the position of PRESIDENT of the entire nation and all the people
The harmless Kirk?
The man who questioned the brain power of black people to understand his arguments, questioned their competence to perform ANY role
Whipping up prejudice & hatred. No?
It’s incredible you keep pretending to be in dismay at division in America, when you use the exact rhetoric the left have been sowing that the antifa nut job used as justification to kill Charlie Kirk.
-
twoleftfeet
- Posts: 2387
- Old WHO Number: 214368
- Has liked: 86 times
- Been liked: 511 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I see that fat mess Abbott has said that protests outside hotels are “ racist “.
No debate.
This is how the left operate, disagree with them and you are labelled or in Charlie Kirk’s case, shot.
No debate.
This is how the left operate, disagree with them and you are labelled or in Charlie Kirk’s case, shot.
- Lee Trundle
- Posts: 3926
- Old WHO Number: 33318
- Been liked: 782 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Sky News have had to upgrade their estimates from thousands to "tens of thousands".
It's difficult for the mainstream media to play this down the amount of numbers that are there.
It's difficult for the mainstream media to play this down the amount of numbers that are there.
- BRANDED
- Posts: 1956
- Location: London
- Old WHO Number: 209826
- Has liked: 102 times
- Been liked: 227 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I’ll give it a go.
Evolutionary game theory is one about populations, growth, survival and offspring and methods employed to achieve payoffs but particularly the payoff of replication.
the West had achieved this very successfully by a combination of religion, science, technology, philosophy and industrialisation from the 19 C. Birth rates and survival in Britain were beyond anything previously known. Access to resources was equally unheard of.
Anyway, jump to the last 50 years and birth rates in the West have plummeted ( interestingly mostly in left leaning populations) while the rest of the World gained all of the benefits we once led in. Most populations are seeing birth rates decline but certain populations are seeing or have seen huge population growth.
What impact does this have on the minds of people around the World? Huge. Access to resources, survival and replication remain critical drivers against the politics of left, right or centre.
The games that are played out all feed into the sense of success or failure of populations. The lad who allegedly committed this crime doesn't seem like a drugged up nutter. He exists in this melting pot of political and religious and cultural warfare.
Who’s winning? Humans in general as we add 80-100 million new humans every year but mostly in Africa and Asia and they want more of what we have.
Evolutionary game theory is a very easy way to explain actions and behaviours. A hawk and a dove have very different methods for survival but they are polarised and its all biological.
Most of us arent generally hawks so we find their behaviour abhorrent. as it may be but they exist and impact the lives of others.
Evolutionary game theory is one about populations, growth, survival and offspring and methods employed to achieve payoffs but particularly the payoff of replication.
the West had achieved this very successfully by a combination of religion, science, technology, philosophy and industrialisation from the 19 C. Birth rates and survival in Britain were beyond anything previously known. Access to resources was equally unheard of.
Anyway, jump to the last 50 years and birth rates in the West have plummeted ( interestingly mostly in left leaning populations) while the rest of the World gained all of the benefits we once led in. Most populations are seeing birth rates decline but certain populations are seeing or have seen huge population growth.
What impact does this have on the minds of people around the World? Huge. Access to resources, survival and replication remain critical drivers against the politics of left, right or centre.
The games that are played out all feed into the sense of success or failure of populations. The lad who allegedly committed this crime doesn't seem like a drugged up nutter. He exists in this melting pot of political and religious and cultural warfare.
Who’s winning? Humans in general as we add 80-100 million new humans every year but mostly in Africa and Asia and they want more of what we have.
Evolutionary game theory is a very easy way to explain actions and behaviours. A hawk and a dove have very different methods for survival but they are polarised and its all biological.
Most of us arent generally hawks so we find their behaviour abhorrent. as it may be but they exist and impact the lives of others.
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I'm quite enjoying all the videos of foaming toothless hillbilly yanks declaring war on..... well they're not too sure since the alleged perpetrator was also a white hillbilly. But they're angry! Grrrrr. Frightening stuff.
-
Fauxstralian
- Posts: 3823
- Old WHO Number: 321173
- Has liked: 67 times
- Been liked: 521 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
Was reading that the grandmother of Tyler Robinson says the family are hardcore MAGA Trump supporters
Being said that the killer may have been a fan of White nationalist Nick Fuentes and despised Kirk because he wasn’t right wing enough for his taste
America is in crisis and is a world of hate & extremism
Being said that the killer may have been a fan of White nationalist Nick Fuentes and despised Kirk because he wasn’t right wing enough for his taste
America is in crisis and is a world of hate & extremism
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
I'm well aware of it, along with the hawk-dove game, was part of my degree, what was pseudo academic about you mentioning them is it has absolutely no bearing on any of this at all imo, unless you'd like to explain why you think it does?
- BRANDED
- Posts: 1956
- Location: London
- Old WHO Number: 209826
- Has liked: 102 times
- Been liked: 227 times
Re: The Official Politics Thread (enter at your own risk)
We live in a biological world.
evolutionary game theory is a well established tried and tested theory. I recommend reading up on it.
evolutionary game theory is a well established tried and tested theory. I recommend reading up on it.