Amazon Search and Bookmark
AFFILIATE SEARCH | Shop Amazon.co.uk using this search bar and support WHO!

Max Kilman

West Ham Online's Football Forum
Post Reply
Eerie Decent
Posts: 1021
Has liked: 161 times
Been liked: 467 times

Kilman Max Kilman

Post Eerie Decent »



This lad is a real problem.

At £40mil, it's getting to the point of worst ever signing territory. The worst crime in football is hiding, centre back is probably the one position you can half get away with it, but not for too long. Shirks taking responsibility, who imo makes him worse than Mavropanos, at least he fronts up, which can lead to mistakes. Kilman doesn't, so it doesn't get highlighted.

We've obviously got a massive overhaul in the summer, but for me, he is the biggest problem in our team and we need to cut our losses if we can. It took a while to spot, because he hides, but you can't fool people for too long. Wolves fans told us, some wouldn't have it, but they were dead right. Absolute fraud of a player.
User avatar
Far Cough UKunt
Posts: 1779
Has liked: 448 times
Been liked: 721 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Far Cough UKunt »

Makes Gary Breen look like Paolo Maldini.
Gary Strodders shank
Posts: 964
Old WHO Number: 304873
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 160 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Gary Strodders shank »

A seven year contract is ridiculous and stinks to be honest

Wasn't there some sort of wrangling over Maidenheads cut between the three clubs where they took a lesser percentage so the deal would go through ?

At 28 ,this deal should take him up to the end of his career although it would appear the pipe and slippers are out already and a Zimmer frame not to far behind.

Apart from the clubs total incompetence in signing such a dud the thing that disappoints me the most is having been awarded such a deal his apparent lack of professionalism pride and reluctance to leave everything on the pitch and training ground to at least try and improve his level of performance.

To even see him scythe someone down in frustration or lose his rag out there would be some sign of a pulse.





 
WHUDeano
Posts: 82
Old WHO Number: 17551
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 45 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post WHUDeano »

I think with all things considered, Kilman must currently be regarded as the worst signing in our history. 
eusebiovic
Posts: 501
Old WHO Number: 15391
Has liked: 928 times
Been liked: 177 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post eusebiovic »

southbankbornnbred wrote: 23 Oct 2025, 08:03 Not that we needed it, but if you wanted yet another glaring example of Sullivan and Brady's weapons-grade stupidity, the Kilman fee and contract take you straight there.

So whenever you see him "switch off" again, as Gary O'Neill, his former manager would say, just think of low-grade decision-makers like Loppy, Sullivan and Brady rubbing their hands with glee.
 
 
They have no capacity to learn the error of their ways...

C Wilson
Kilman
Ings
Wilshire
Winston Reid (decent enough defender given a beast of an over generous, long term contract)
Carlos Sanchez
Chicharito (the little Mexican)
Andy Carroll 

That's just half a dozen or so off the top of my head...there are countless others...they simply refuse to fucking learn. 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5029
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 650 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Mike Oxsaw »

southbankbornnbred wrote: 23 Oct 2025, 07:59 The most depressing thing about Kilman isn't even that we paid £40m for an absolute ringer. It's that we gave him a SEVEN year contract on 100k a week, and he's just over a year into that contract.

Unless we are relegated and another side is nuclear-grade stupid enough to pay decent money for him, and to him, we are quite likely to have Kilman on our books for years. It'll be a much longer version of Danny Ings: he's got absolutely no incentive to move on. Nobody else will pay him 100k a week. And absolutely nobody will pay him £30m for another six years.

The fee (£40m) was a truly appalling decision. The contract and wages (£35m+) are almost criminal.

There's a good chance we will still be complaining about Kilman and his wages in 2031.

(PS - I don't blame Max Kilman for signing that contract, btw. In his shoes, I would have signed it faster than you could blink).
It's such a ludicrous contract that I wouldn't be at all surprised, given the way the club operates, if a percentage of that fee/those wages vanishes into brown envelopes that then make their surreptitious way back to certain board members who may have sanctioned the purchase
Last edited by Mike Oxsaw on 23 Oct 2025, 09:08, edited 1 time in total.
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1496
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 376 times
Been liked: 567 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post southbankbornnbred »

Not that we needed it, but if you wanted yet another glaring example of Sullivan and Brady's weapons-grade stupidity, the Kilman fee and contract take you straight there.

So whenever you see him "switch off" again, as Gary O'Neill, his former manager would say, just think of low-grade decision-makers like Loppy, Sullivan and Brady rubbing their hands with glee.
southbankbornnbred
Posts: 1496
Old WHO Number: 14766
Has liked: 376 times
Been liked: 567 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post southbankbornnbred »

The most depressing thing about Kilman isn't even that we paid £40m for an absolute ringer. It's that we gave him a SEVEN year contract on 100k a week, and he's just over a year into that contract.

Unless we are relegated and another side is nuclear-grade stupid enough to pay decent money for him, and to him, we are quite likely to have Kilman on our books for years. It'll be a much longer version of Danny Ings: he's got absolutely no incentive to move on. Nobody else will pay him 100k a week. And absolutely nobody will pay him £30m for another six years.

The fee (£40m) was a truly appalling decision. The contract and wages (£35m+) are almost criminal.

There's a good chance we will still be complaining about Kilman and his wages in 2031.

(PS - I don't blame Max Kilman for signing that contract, btw. In his shoes, I would have signed it faster than you could blink).
honky cat
Posts: 1247
Has liked: 714 times
Been liked: 476 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post honky cat »

Gary O Neil is just pointing out what every coach and player in the league would know about Kilman. Every attacking player just waiting for him to switch off for a minute and then go for it.

Played every single game for us since signing?  An automatic selection every time, never fighting for his place, never coming back from injury or suspension and having to dislodge another player. 
User avatar
Mike Oxsaw
Posts: 5029
Location: Flip between Belvedere & Buri Ram and anywhere else I fancy, just because I can.
Old WHO Number: 14021
Has liked: 45 times
Been liked: 650 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Mike Oxsaw »

I'm struggling to think of a player (we've bought)  that needs to prove his worth more that this guy.
User avatar
ragingbull
Posts: 584
Old WHO Number: 210831
Has liked: 248 times
Been liked: 120 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post ragingbull »



Obviously a spanner has being thrown in his engine.
User avatar
Keep dreaming
Posts: 1613
Location: here and there, mostly here
Old WHO Number: 225644
Has liked: 555 times
Been liked: 282 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Keep dreaming »

If Mads Harmansen was sent to bench for his contribution, Max Kilman should be sent to the fucking butcher's.

The only positive with him is his name.
eusebiovic
Posts: 501
Old WHO Number: 15391
Has liked: 928 times
Been liked: 177 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post eusebiovic »

Sir Alf" wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 18:57 Todibo was bought to be a ball playing CB in a 3 man unit. His distribution and ball carrying from deep are what got him noticed eventually but aerially and physically aint really his game and in the Prem athleticism, speed and strength are pre requisites nowadays.  Most of our players are wanting in yhat respect.  A huge “Rice shaped hole” was never filled and we are paying for it now big time
A sweeper without portfolio.

Marvellous! 
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 3711
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 1019 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post El Scorchio »

honky cat" wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 21:41 Last season everyone was cunting off poor Mavvers when this dickhead was the real problem. Terrible player, we need to wipe our mouth and take the hit in january. Just throwing good money after bad. Has he missed a single game? Why is he not being dropped.
The player we should have signed from Wolves  was playing last night - Collins.

 
Mav is still shit as well, mind. The problem with him is that he can be decent/competent for almost all of a game but then do something absolutely stupid and cost us a goal or give away a penalty- case in point the end of the Everton game when he was fucking lucky not to after being an absolute bonehead in getting us right in trouble. He seems to have one horrendous ricket in him every single game. You cannot rely on a single one of them to actually be solid for 90 minutes. 
Gary Strodders shank
Posts: 964
Old WHO Number: 304873
Has liked: 15 times
Been liked: 160 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Gary Strodders shank »

When was the last time a centre half actually got on the scoresheet for us ?

Aguard ? 
Zouma ?..
Mav ?

Kilman and Tobido are so fking lazy I'm not sure they even bother coming up for corners anymore.
 
User avatar
Keep dreaming
Posts: 1613
Location: here and there, mostly here
Old WHO Number: 225644
Has liked: 555 times
Been liked: 282 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Keep dreaming »

Well there is a heck of players we Should have signed.
 
honky cat
Posts: 1247
Has liked: 714 times
Been liked: 476 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post honky cat »

Last season everyone was cunting off poor Mavvers when this dickhead was the real problem. Terrible player, we need to wipe our mouth and take the hit in january. Just throwing good money after bad. Has he missed a single game? Why is he not being dropped.
The player we should have signed from Wolves  was playing last night - Collins.
 
User avatar
Keep dreaming
Posts: 1613
Location: here and there, mostly here
Old WHO Number: 225644
Has liked: 555 times
Been liked: 282 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Keep dreaming »

Yeah, everyone can look good on a edited YouTube clip.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 6610
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3798 times
Been liked: 1986 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Massive Attack »

zico wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 17:34 If you look up Todibo on You Tube the clips show a totally different player.  Maybe he got more time in the other Leagues or as you say he just isn't arsed over here.
 
 

Maybe because the clips are condensed into 4 minutes and not over the course of a game where he rarely lasts an hour. I reckon Iain Dowie might look decent in only 2 minutes of action. Ok that's maybe stretching it but principle still stands.
User avatar
Keep dreaming
Posts: 1613
Location: here and there, mostly here
Old WHO Number: 225644
Has liked: 555 times
Been liked: 282 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Keep dreaming »

zico wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 19:57
Sir Alf" wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 18:57 Todibo was bought to be a ball playing CB in a 3 man unit. His distribution and ball carrying from deep are what got him noticed eventually but aerially and physically aint really his game and in the Prem athleticism, speed and strength are pre requisites nowadays.  Most of our players are wanting in yhat respect.  A huge “Rice shaped hole” was never filled and we are paying for it now big time
Maybe stick him in midfield and Tomas at the back!  😁
Or maybe remove them both.
Not fit for the shirt, Potts and Adiele should be the starters from now on.
Unfortunately, the clubs incompetence is beyond belief 
User avatar
MaryMillingtonsGhost
Posts: 959
Old WHO Number: 300173
Has liked: 579 times
Been liked: 391 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post MaryMillingtonsGhost »

I'm guessing the title of this thread is also the answer to 'who is the biggest waste of space you've seen in  claret and blue over the past 20 years'?
Where do I collect my fiver?
zico
Posts: 4540
Old WHO Number: 10629
Has liked: 480 times
Been liked: 290 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post zico »

Sir Alf" wrote: 21 Oct 2025, 18:57 Todibo was bought to be a ball playing CB in a 3 man unit. His distribution and ball carrying from deep are what got him noticed eventually but aerially and physically aint really his game and in the Prem athleticism, speed and strength are pre requisites nowadays.  Most of our players are wanting in yhat respect.  A huge “Rice shaped hole” was never filled and we are paying for it now big time
Maybe stick him in midfield and Tomas at the back!  😁
Sir Alf
Posts: 2725
Old WHO Number: 10229
Has liked: 37 times
Been liked: 484 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Sir Alf »

Todibo was bought to be a ball playing CB in a 3 man unit. His distribution and ball carrying from deep are what got him noticed eventually but aerially and physically aint really his game and in the Prem athleticism, speed and strength are pre requisites nowadays.  Most of our players are wanting in yhat respect.  A huge “Rice shaped hole” was never filled and we are paying for it now big time
zico
Posts: 4540
Old WHO Number: 10629
Has liked: 480 times
Been liked: 290 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post zico »

If you look up Todibo on You Tube the clips show a totally different player.  Maybe he got more time in the other Leagues or as you say he just isn't arsed over here.
User avatar
El Scorchio
Posts: 3711
Old WHO Number: 227648
Has liked: 184 times
Been liked: 1019 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post El Scorchio »

Yup, Todibo without question has talent but cannot be arsed. Clearly doesn't bother getting/staying match fit and is a woeful decision maker- that dive in far too far up the pitch where he totally missed and they were away in the second half sums him up.

Mav tries but just isn't very good and is a calamity waiting to happen every single match
Kilman is lazy and doesn't concentrate
Todibo is lazy and doesn't give a shit

Those are our centre backs gentlemen. 90 million quid's worth. I'm not even bothering to mention the glorified coathanger we got from Brighton.
User avatar
Massive Attack
Posts: 6610
Old WHO Number: 321955
Has liked: 3798 times
Been liked: 1986 times

Re: Max Kilman

Post Massive Attack »

The dope is definitely sharing sneaky reefers with Kilman in the showers when no cunts looking. Why else wear a nose plaster to aid breathing when he's clearly allergic to running the lazy cսnt.
Post Reply