Tim nice but dim pulls plug on Beeb career

[Massive Attack]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/cd9kqz1yyxkt

He's run a car crash of an organisation that's got way out of hand with so many gaffes from the Trump splicing lies to the Deathto the IDF fiasco in the summer. Another CEO Doris also gets the boot.

 

Nothing more these days than just a Leftist propaganda machine.

Defund the BBC.

[only1billybonds]

Yes Nurse.

And is it really essential to take a team of almost 1000 'employees' to Glastonbury?

They sent their climate editor to Portugal last year during a heatwave. They flew him out there (net zero eh) so he could appear on the news to tell us it was hot!

When Mark Saggers joined them he asked how he went about claiming expenses for his oyster card. He was told to bin it and start taking cabs everywhere.

The list of examples of waste is endless, all paid for by the taxpayer.

 

[Nurse Ratched]

A other reason I'd like to see the wretched BBC go under is the rampant nepotism. Why should dozens of beige Dimblebys and the likes of Zoe Ball be provided with a cushy gravy train just because their parents worked there? 

[Mike Oxsaw]

Totally agree with ED.

If the BBC truely believes they offer an outstanding service they should back that up by opening it up to subscription. If its that good,people will gobble it up. Comes to just shy of £15 per month, many people are paying almost a score for netflix so there's the encouragement for them. This wont happen of course as taking the license away slows that gravy train right down.

The TV licence  was initially introduced as a stealth census. The argument was that every man and his dog would want a TV set for the new service, so this was a great way of putting names to addresses. The "fee" was simply a disguise for the real purpose, as the government would have funded the nascent BBC anyway.

At the time of introduction, it would be almost 100% breadwinner/head of the household (i.e. a MAN) who would apply for the licence ar the Post Office.

I did a month on the TV detector vans as part of my apprenticeship. TV detector man during the week, installer of (illegal) on-shore pirate radio transmitters all over London at the weekend.

[only1billybonds]

Totally agree with ED.

If the BBC truely believes they offer an outstanding service they should back that up by opening it up to subscription. If its that good,people will gobble it up. Comes to just shy of £15 per month, many people are paying almost a score for netflix so there's the encouragement for them. This wont happen of course as taking the license away slows that gravy train right down.

[RBshorty]

License fee. = Propaganda Tax.

Nowt will change with too many piggies with their noses in the trough.! The top brass are hoping the British Plebs do what the British Plebs always do.

Moan about it.
Do little about it.
Then. Forget about it.

[Eerie Decent]

I can't get my head around why this is so difficult.

We're constantly told how AMAZING it is that the world has changed so dramatically, and that the old GAMMONS just need to shut up pining for the good old days and get with the times.

These same people (people like Sven) are telling us that the BBC shouldn't get with the times, and has to remain a PUBLIC service rather than a SUBSCRIPTION service like every other fucking service that exists across the world. I think that's the gist of it.

It's very simple, the BBC should stand on it's own feet, and let everyone decide if they choose to watch it or not. And all the people who love it so much, can continue to pay for it.

[Crassus]

Get well soon my old China

In other BBC news, just seen on my LinkedIn feed a brave Beeb war correspondent reporting 'frontline' in Ukraine
Fella laying prone in rubble, deadly environment clearly

Then in the background an old lady calmly enters the frame, ambling along walking her dog!
Then other villagers moving normally

No suggestion of over dramatizing the position from me of course
Can't say the same from other posters mind - the BBC really have lost all credibility it appears

[only1billybonds]

Yea ok mate tho I been off all week with a chest infection. 

Only holiday I've had this year. 

[Crassus]

Hiya Bill
All ok mate and you?

[only1billybonds]

Crassus,how are you, its been far to long.

You are sorely missed.

[Crassus]

Massive Attack » 14 Nov 2025 13:29
Absolutely correct

'mistake'
'misjudgment
'error'

And any other phrase that implies individual error is fundamentally wrong and nothing of the sorts

It is and has been for years, institutionally absorbed in its own agenda, prosecuted by a legion of self righteous, holier than though, metrocentric shitcunts
A travesty given its historic value
Drag it out and shoot it

[Massive Attack]

I don’t believe the edit changed the nature and tone of Trumps speech but the bbc should have made it clear they had bolted two parts of it together without making it clear 
That was a mistake 
And if they had done the same to anyone that would still have been a mistake … Trump , Starmer, whoever
The bbc as I have said many times need a shake up particularly in their news coverage which I believe is inferior to Channel 4 despite having much more resources
Their general behaviour is error prone & way below the standards they should reach

In regards to Trumps speech I believe he WAS inciting violence 
Understand 220 people were charged in relation to the riot at the Capitol and when cross examined they gave one answer as to why they did what they did
Cos Trump told me to
He is a ludicrous dangerous grifter & the sooner he is deposed the better

 

 

It's nothing like a mistake. It's blatant intentional manipulation of words he said almost an hour apart spliced together. And not once, but twice on different programmes which shows a similar pattern of behaviour that should send shivers down audiences spines that was even called out at the time by a guest on the segment but ignored.

If they can do this to the President of the United States of America (as well as doctor a current British MP statement during PMQs 2 days ago), then they could do it to anyone. 

[Lee Trundle]

You're not going to pretend you've seen and listened Trump's speech in its entirety, are you Sven?

[Massive Attack]

Chris Packham is an embarrassing prat. 

I like people that look out for the welfare of animals, but Packham is being a prick here. How the fuck can you defend the indefensible?

Chris Packham fingers Otters, pass it on... 🗣

[Fauxstralian]

I don’t believe the edit changed the nature and tone of Trumps speech but the bbc should have made it clear they had bolted two parts of it together without making it clear 
That was a mistake 
And if they had done the same to anyone that would still have been a mistake … Trump , Starmer, whoever
The bbc as I have said many times need a shake up particularly in their news coverage which I believe is inferior to Channel 4 despite having much more resources
Their general behaviour is error prone & way below the standards they should reach

In regards to Trumps speech I believe he WAS inciting violence 
Understand 220 people were charged in relation to the riot at the Capitol and when cross examined they gave one answer as to why they did what they did
Cos Trump told me to
He is a ludicrous dangerous grifter & the sooner he is deposed the better

[Far Cough UKunt]

Chris Packham is an embarrassing prat. 

I like people that look out for the welfare of animals, but Packham is being a prick here. How the fuck can you defend the indefensible?

[Nurse Ratched]

Chris Packham is an embarrassing prat. 

[THUNDERCLINT]

Today, it's Chris PACKHAM's turn to tell us that there's nothing wrong with the BBC.  It's funny their own staff can't admit they're part of the problem.

Wouldn't expect anything else from him. He screams 'wrong-un' to me

Whatt Joey Barton might call a duck nonce?

[only1billybonds]

Sven.

Genuine question here. Would you be so staunch in your defence of the BBC had the 'victim' anyone other than Trump? 

Or had GB news done something similar to Starmer,would you be as equally forgiving?

[Lee Trundle]

‘We acknowledge its flaws and are not seeking to exonerate these or excuse any of its mistakes’ 

 

 

 

Not sure that's going to cut it with the general public (which I'm guessing why you find this difficult to understand).

It's hardly an admission you purposely tried to mislead the public when you say things like it was an "error of judgement".  They need to come clean themselves about how bias they are.

The more I see people like Chris PACKHAM defending them, the more I want Trump to go after them.  And just remember, that money that goes to Trump, comes out of your pocket, Sven.

[Massive Attack]

Chris Packham: "Imagine a world without the BBC. Imagine a State-controlled Media" ... 

Chris Packham: "And there can be no doubt that the BBC delivers World Class Media" ...

Who wrote your shocking biased Media spin, Chris? Was it..





 

[onsideman]

Today, it's Chris PACKHAM's turn to tell us that there's nothing wrong with the BBC.  It's funny their own staff can't admit they're part of the problem.

Wouldn't expect anything else from him. He screams 'wrong-un' to me

[THUNDERCLINT]

‘We acknowledge its flaws and are not seeking to exonerate these or excuse any of its mistakes’ 

Nothing wrong?
Learn to read Lee-Anne
Imagine a world where news sources were just GB News, Sky & bullshit on Facebook
Or utter bollocks from President Trump & his social media goons like Musk & the curly haired bloke from Facebook 

None of those rob the taxpapyer for 4 billion a year to piss in their pocket and tell them it's raining.

The BBC needs a napalm enema.

[THUNDERCLINT]

Today, it's Chris PACKHAM's turn to tell us that there's nothing wrong with the BBC.  It's funny their own staff can't admit they're part of the problem.

 

 

The fact there's a bunch of Anon signatures of there tells you even people that support the cancer ridden arsehole known as the BBC know the BBC is a cancer ridden arsehole. They also know Chris Packham is a cսnt better not associated with.

[Fauxstralian]

‘We acknowledge its flaws and are not seeking to exonerate these or excuse any of its mistakes’ 

Nothing wrong?
Learn to read Lee-Anne
Imagine a world where news sources were just GB News, Sky & bullshit on Facebook
Or utter bollocks from President Trump & his social media goons like Musk & the curly haired bloke from Facebook